Every 10 days the Strait of Hormuz is closed, a 200-million-barrel physical gap is created in the global oil flow. This is not a temporary kink but a massive hole in the supply chain that will take months to resolve and normalize, even long after transit resumes.

Asian refineries, facing a potential cutoff of crude from the Strait of Hormuz, are reducing processing rates to prolong operations. This immediate reduction in the supply of refined products like jet fuel causes their prices to spike before the full impact of the crude oil shortage is felt globally.

In a severe supply shock, demand destruction isn't about wealthy consumers driving less. Instead, lower-income countries are priced out of the market entirely, unable to attract scarce barrels. This transforms a price problem for developed nations into an outright physical shortage for developing ones.

The impact of an oil supply disruption on price is a convex function of its duration. A short-term closure results in delayed deliveries with minimal price effect, while a prolonged one exhausts storage and requires triple-digit prices to force demand destruction and rebalance the market.

Major historical oil price movements were triggered by supply-demand imbalances of just 2-3 million barrels per day. A disruption at the Strait of Hormuz would impact 20 million barrels daily, a scale that dwarfs previous crises and renders standard analytical models inadequate.

While many fear production shutdowns, a more significant and probable risk is a logistical shock from shipping disruptions. Even modest delays in tanker transit times could effectively remove millions of barrels per day from the market, causing a significant price spike without a single well being shut down.

The conflict's primary impact on oil is not that supply is offline, but that its transport through the Strait of Hormuz is blocked. This distinction is key to understanding price scenarios, as supply exists but cannot be delivered.

Analysts misinterpret rising "oil on water" as a bearish sign. A country shifting exports to a more distant destination (e.g., Brazil to China instead of the US) increases the volume of oil in transit due to longer voyage times, but the actual available supply to the market can be declining.

While short-term oil contracts react to immediate geopolitical stress, a sustained rise in longer-dated prices above $80-$85 indicates the market believes the disruption is persistent, signaling a more severe, long-term economic impact.