Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

There is a disconnect between what consumers say and do regarding brand purpose. When prompted in a survey, they agree it is important. However, when Kantar asked consumers to explain their recent purchases, purpose-related reasons were almost nonexistent, revealing it's not a driver of choice.

Related Insights

In a market saturated with products offering similar functional benefits, consumers make choices based on 'emotional ROI.' Brands must dig deeper than features and tap into the underlying emotional reasons for a purchase, connecting their purpose to the consumer's personal aspirations and feelings.

Despite massive ad spends, research from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute reveals that purpose-led marketing isn't landing. Only one in ten consumers could correctly associate the mission statements of brands like Dove and Ben & Jerry's with the actual brand, suggesting purpose is not the key brand differentiator marketers believe it to be.

The decline of value-driven brands like Everlane (transparency) and Allbirds (sustainability) demonstrates a market reality. Despite stated preferences for ethics, consumers’ purchasing decisions are ultimately driven more by price and convenience than by proclaimed corporate values.

Despite a strong social mission, Warby Parker learned from surveys that customers prioritize style and price above all. Consequently, they lead with these messages in their marketing, often not mentioning the “buy-one-give-one” program until after a purchase is made, focusing on core customer drivers.

After using a product, customers articulate its value based on the various benefits and features they've discovered. Founders often mistake this post-purchase feedback for the initial buying trigger, leading them to build marketing messages around a wide array of benefits rather than the single, simple cause that actually prompted the purchase.

Unilever's attempt to assign a sustainability "purpose" to all 400 brands faltered. When the purpose wasn't a tight, natural fit with a brand's core functional and emotional benefits (e.g., mayonnaise), it confused consumers, felt inauthentic, and resulted in wasted marketing resources.

Marketers, who think about their brand constantly, fail to recognize that for consumers, the brand is insignificant amid hundreds of others. This disconnect leads them to overestimate their asset's distinctiveness and the consumer's engagement. The core principle is: "the consumer doesn't give a sh*t."

What people claim they will do in surveys often differs dramatically from their actual purchasing behavior. This phenomenon, 'consumer dissonance,' makes survey data on price sensitivity and buying intent highly unreliable. Real-world A/B testing or sales data provides a far more accurate predictor of consumer action.

Brand affinity cannot be accurately measured with subjective tools like consumer surveys or brand lift studies, which are often "fake reports." The only real, tangible measure of brand loyalty is objective data like repeat sales and lifetime customer value. Focus on what customers do, not what they say.

Consumers often provide surface-level reasons for purchases. By repeatedly asking "why," marketers can bypass these rationalizations to reveal the deep emotional driver (e.g., showing love, not just buying chocolate). This technique uncovers the core motivation that advertising should actually target.