To make its AI agents robust enough for production, Sierra runs thousands of simulated conversations before every release. These "AI testing AI" scenarios model everything from angry customers to background noise and different languages, allowing flaws to be found internally before customers experience them.
Related Insights
To ensure AI reliability, Salesforce builds environments that mimic enterprise CRM workflows, not game worlds. They use synthetic data and introduce corner cases like background noise, accents, or conflicting user requests to find and fix agent failure points before deployment, closing the "reality gap."
The biggest hurdle for enterprise AI adoption is uncertainty. A dedicated "lab" environment allows brands to experiment safely with partners like Microsoft. This lets them pressure-test AI applications, fine-tune models on their data, and build confidence before deploying at scale, addressing fears of losing control over data and brand voice.
Beyond automating 80% of customer inquiries with AI, Sea leverages these tools as trainers for its human agents. They created an AI "custom service trainer" to improve the performance and consistency of their human support team, creating a powerful symbiotic system rather than just replacing people.
Salesforce operates under a 'Customer Zero' philosophy, requiring its own global operations to run on new software before public release. This internal 'dogfooding' forces them to solve real-world enterprise challenges, ensuring their AI and data products are robust, scalable, and effective before reaching customers.
Treating AI evaluation like a final exam is a mistake. For critical enterprise systems, evaluations should be embedded at every step of an agent's workflow (e.g., after planning, before action). This is akin to unit testing in classic software development and is essential for building trustworthy, production-ready agents.
Traditional software testing fails because developers can't anticipate every failure mode. Antithesis inverts this by running applications in a deterministic simulation of a hostile real world. By "throwing the kitchen sink" at software—simulating crashes, bad users, and hackers—it empirically discovers rare, critical bugs that manual test cases would miss.
To ensure product quality, Fixer pitted its AI against 10 of its own human executive assistants on the same tasks. They refused to launch features until the AI could consistently outperform the humans on accuracy, using their service business as a direct training and validation engine.
To mitigate risks like AI hallucinations and high operational costs, enterprises should first deploy new AI tools internally to support human agents. This "agent-assist" model allows for monitoring, testing, and refinement in a controlled environment before exposing the technology directly to customers.
Before engaging with actual customers, AI tools can simulate interviews and generate likely objections, such as "This won’t fit my workflow." This allows product managers to walk into real interviews better prepared, knowing exactly which risky assumptions to test first and how to handle pushback.
Despite mature backtesting frameworks, Intercom repeatedly sees promising offline results fail in production. The "messiness of real human interaction" is unpredictable, making at-scale A/B tests essential for validating AI performance improvements, even for changes as small as a tenth of a percentage point.
