Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Companies with long, complex enterprise sales cycles often mistakenly apply short-term lead generation tactics and metrics. This mismatch between a brand-building, long-term motion and a demand for immediate leads is like fitting a square peg in a round hole and is destined to fail.

Related Insights

By measuring success on 'last lead source,' the company was incentivized to pour money into paid search for product trials—a clear final touchpoint. This model blinded them to the higher value of other lead types and actively discouraged investment in demand creation activities that build brand and generate higher-quality leads.

Top-performing companies are abandoning traditional metrics like MQLs. They now focus on understanding the entire prospecting process—from lead creation to BDR/SDR engagement—to generate stronger pipeline, higher win rates, and more revenue with less wasted effort.

CMO Ben Schechter argues that tracking raw lead count is a dangerous metric. A marketing leader can easily manipulate lead scoring to hit a volume target, flooding sales with low-quality prospects. This erodes sales team trust and causes them to stop following up on all marketing-generated leads.

When a clunky sales process fails, founders often incorrectly conclude their product isn't good enough and retreat to building more features. The real problem is typically the sales motion itself, which isn't aligned with customer demand. This leads to a cycle of building instead of fixing the sales process.

In B2B sales with multiple decision-makers, tracking individual MQLs is a "lazy metric" that misrepresents buying intent. Success depends on identifying and engaging the entire buying group. Marketing's goal should be to qualify the group, not just a single lead.

One company discovered that while MQLs were plentiful, they took 130 days to convert. In contrast, "hand-raiser" leads converted in just 12 days at a much higher rate. Focusing on conversion velocity reveals where to allocate resources for efficient growth.

The primary challenge in implementing ABX is not technology or tactics, but achieving organizational balance. Sales teams often want immediate results, while true ABX is a long-term journey of building trust. Success requires joint goal-setting and flexible GTM strategies between marketing and sales leaders.

Companies stay stuck in failing models for three reasons: 1) The system rewards controllable but ineffective activity (more calls, more MQLs). 2) Leaders fear the perceived risk of foundational change. 3) A culture of urgency favors quick tactical fixes over addressing deep, systemic issues.

Labeling an ABM initiative a "pilot" signals a lack of long-term commitment and sets unrealistic expectations for quick results, especially when dealing with long sales cycles. To succeed, ABM must be positioned from the outset as a core, long-term go-to-market strategy that requires sustained investment.

Relying on a single data point like "first touch" to explain pipeline creation is flawed. It ignores the complex buyer journey and inevitably leads to a blame game—marketing providing "shitty leads" versus sales doing "poor follow-up"—instead of a systematic analysis of what is truly broken in the process.