During massive technological shifts like the early internet or today's AI boom, predicting where sustainable moats will form is nearly impossible. The industry structure is a complex, adaptive system with too many unknowns. Early, confident proclamations about moats are almost always wrong in retrospect.
Related Insights
As AI models democratize access to information and analysis, traditional data advantages will disappear. The only durable competitive advantage will be an organization's ability to learn and adapt. The speed of the "breakthrough -> implementation -> behavior change" loop will separate winners from losers.
In the fast-evolving AI space, traditional moats are less relevant. The new defensibility comes from momentum—a combination of rapid product shipment velocity and effective distribution. Teams that can build and distribute faster than competitors will win, as the underlying technology layer is constantly shifting.
As AI and better tools commoditize software creation, traditional technology moats are shrinking. The new defensible advantages are forms of liquidity: aggregated data, marketplace activity, or social interactions. These network effects are harder for competitors to replicate than code or features.
The long-held belief that a complex codebase provides a durable competitive advantage is becoming obsolete due to AI. As software becomes easier to replicate, defensibility shifts away from the technology itself and back toward classic business moats like network effects, brand reputation, and deep industry integration.
Brand is becoming a key moat in AI infrastructure, a sector where it was previously irrelevant. In rapidly growing and confusing markets, education can't keep pace with adoption. As a result, customers default to the brands they recognize, creating powerful monopolies for early leaders. This mirrors the early internet era when Netscape dominated through brand recognition.
In a world where AI implementation is becoming cheaper, the real competitive advantage isn't speed or features. It's the accumulated knowledge gained through the difficult, iterative process of building and learning. This "pain" of figuring out what truly works for a specific problem becomes a durable moat.
Investors obsess over moats, but in a rapidly changing AI landscape, a startup's ability to quickly build and ship products that unlock latent demand is a more reliable predictor of success than any theoretical defensibility.
In the SaaS era, a 2-year head start created a defensible product moat. In the AI era, new entrants can leverage the latest foundation models to instantly create a product on par with, or better than, an incumbent's, erasing any first-mover advantage.
The fluid nature of AI means traditional moats are unreliable. Defensibility is no longer a static plan but a daily practice of innovation and execution. Even established public companies feel threatened, proving that staying ahead requires constant movement and earning your position every day.
AI drastically accelerates the ability of incumbents and competitors to clone new products, making early traction and features less defensible. For seed investors, this means the traditional "first-mover advantage" is fragile, shifting the investment thesis heavily towards the quality and adaptability of the founding team.
