When evaluating a candidate's job history, distinguish between those 'running towards' an exciting opportunity and those 'running from' a negative situation. The former is a strong positive signal of ambition and conviction. The latter can be a red flag that warrants deeper investigation into potential performance or culture fit issues.
Standard reference checks yield generic praise. To identify true A-players, ask their former colleagues a high-stakes question: “Would you quit your current job to work for this person again?” An enthusiastic “yes” is the strongest hiring signal you can get.
Treat hiring as a compounding flywheel. A new employee should not only be a great contributor but also make the company more attractive to future A-players, whether through their network, reputation, or interview presence. This focus on recruiting potential ensures talent density increases over time.
Short tenures at multiple companies are not inherently negative to hiring managers. What matters is the candidate's ability to articulate a clear narrative explaining each move. A story that demonstrates intentional skill acquisition (e.g., moving to gain product marketing experience) is more compelling than the tenure itself.
The most promising hires are often high-agency individuals constrained by their current environment—'caged animals' who need to be unleashed. Look for candidates who could achieve significantly more if not for their team or organization's limitations. This is a powerful signal of untapped potential and resourcefulness.
Many leaders hire defensively, trying to avoid a costly mistake. This fear-based mindset leads to negative assumptions and misinterpretations of candidate signals. Shifting to an abundance mindset—believing the right person is out there—fosters curiosity and leads to better evaluation and hiring outcomes.
To clarify difficult talent decisions, ask yourself: "Would I enthusiastically rehire this person for this same role today?" This binary question, used at Stripe, bypasses emotional ambiguity and provides a clear signal. A "no" doesn't mean immediate termination, but it mandates that some corrective action must be taken.
A candidate can claim they want growth, but their resume tells the real story. Scrutinize *why* they moved between specific companies. A move for a bigger salary versus a move to work under a renowned leader reveals their actual priorities far more accurately than their interview answers.
Beyond IQ and EQ, interview for 'Resilience Quotient' (RQ)—the ability to persevere through setbacks. A key tactic is to ask candidates about their proudest achievement, then follow up with, 'What would you do differently?' to see how they navigated strife and learned from it.
Your internal monologue during hiring reveals if you're making the right choice. If you think, "I really need to fill this role," you're on the path to settling. The right candidate sparks the feeling of, "I don't even care if I have a role for this person, I have to get them in."
Hiring managers frequently discard resumes showing short tenures, assuming the candidate is unreliable. This assumption is a critical pitfall. Probing deeper often reveals legitimate context like company acquisitions, contract roles, or industry-wide layoffs, uncovering a resilient and experienced candidate.