We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
A sponsor can fail you in three subtle ways. They may say the right things but never risk their political capital. They may genuinely believe in you but lack the actual power ('juice') to influence decisions. Or, most dangerously, they may only advocate for people who remind them of themselves.
The ultimate way to master the dynamics of sponsorship is to practice it yourself. Actively look for opportunities to spend your own political capital to advance someone else's career. This provides firsthand experience with the costs, risks, and rewards involved.
When asking someone to be your sponsor, directly reference the fact that key decisions happen in private. Use a script like Carla Harris's: state your readiness for promotion and acknowledge that you need an advocate 'pounding the table' on your behalf behind closed doors.
The trend towards flat organizations, often promoted in agile environments, can eliminate the middle management layer responsible for formal advocacy. This forces sponsorship into informal networks, which are less visible, less meritocratic, and more susceptible to affinity bias.
Placing all your advancement hopes on one sponsor is risky. If they leave the company, lose influence, or the relationship sours, you are back to square one. Instead, cultivate a 'portfolio of sponsors' for different situations to diversify your support system.
Understand the critical difference between mentorship and sponsorship. A mentor offers advice based on their past experiences. A sponsor actively uses their influence and political capital to create concrete opportunities for your advancement. Career acceleration comes from sponsorship.
A single internal advocate can be easily dismissed by others as just "the person who likes that vendor." However, cultivating three or more champions from different parts of the business fundamentally changes the dynamic. This transforms individual preference into organizational consensus, making your solution the clear and accepted choice.
A key difference between a mentor and a sponsor is the resource they expend. Mentors invest their time to advise you. Sponsors invest their personal credibility and political capital to advocate for you, which is a much higher-stakes commitment that carries tangible risk.
'Teaser' stakeholders value innovation and are vocally supportive of your solution, creating the illusion of a champion. However, they have a low bias for action and avoid risk, often due to a political or relationship-based position. To advance the deal, sellers must build consensus with other, more action-oriented individuals to support the Teaser.
A mentor helps build your skills and advises you on navigating your career. A sponsor, however, uses their political capital and reputation to advocate for you in high-stakes conversations where promotions and opportunities are decided—rooms you are not in.
Sponsorship is distinct from mentorship. A sponsor actively uses their influence to create opportunities for you, even when you aren't present. This can involve recommending you for a speaking engagement they must decline or suggesting you for a project. These sponsors can come from unexpected professional circles.