To maintain a flat, hands-on engineering culture without dedicated managers, Fal replaces traditional one-on-ones. They feel 1-on-1s can force negativity and instead use small group discussions with mixed tenure and roles. This format fosters more constructive, solution-oriented conversations rather than simple complaint sessions.
Companies mistakenly bundle management with authority, forcing top performers onto a management track to gain influence. Separate them. Define management's role as coordination and context-sharing, allowing senior individual contributors to drive decisions without managing people.
When managing teams across different cultures (e.g., US, Taiwan, Japan), a leader can bypass complex cultural frameworks by simply asking each person, 'What's the best way for me to deliver feedback to you?' This personalizes communication, eliminates guesswork, and demonstrates respect.
In a highly collaborative and fast-paced environment, assign explicit ownership for every feature, no matter how small. The goal isn't to assign blame for failures but to empower individuals with the agency to make decisions, build consensus, and see their work through to completion.
Believing traditional weekly 1-on-1s are inefficient and repetitive, V0's leader eliminated them. He favors discussing shared topics in group settings (like a Slack huddle) and reserves direct 1-on-1 time for specific situations like onboarding, rather than a fixed weekly cadence.
To avoid stifling teams with bureaucracy, leaders should provide slightly less structure than seems necessary. This approach, described as "give ground grudgingly," forces teams to think actively and prevents the feeling of "walking in the muck" that comes from excessive process. It's a sign of a healthy system when people feel they need a bit more structure, not less.
WCM avoids the 'family' metaphor, which implies unconditional belonging and can make performance conversations difficult. They prefer framing the team as 'a group of friends,' which emphasizes voluntary commitment and a mutual desire not to let each other down, fostering greater accountability.
Gamma maintains a flat, high-impact organization by eschewing traditional managers. Instead, all leaders are "player-coaches"—they actively contribute as individual contributors while also mentoring their teams. This keeps leadership close to the work and empowers teams to adapt quickly without top-down commands.
The "99% Invisible" team uses shorthand phrases like "CWGHF" (Can We Get Here Faster?). This coded language transforms potentially harsh criticism into a shared, objective problem to solve, depersonalizing feedback and protecting creative morale during intense group edits.
Bianca Gates' "Lean In Circle" thrived for 13+ years due to its structure: mandatory attendance (only two misses allowed), a focus on deep topics (the "top and bottom 5%"), and strict confidentiality. This format prevents surface-level chatter and builds true trust.
To prevent resentment in high-pressure teams, implement a scheduled forum for fearless feedback, like a "Sunday SmackDown." This creates a predictable, safe container for airing grievances—personal or professional. By separating critique from daily operations, it allows team members to be open and constructive without the awkwardness or fear of disrupting morale, thereby preventing small issues from escalating.