The issue of creating fake experts for media coverage, exposed as a "Hall of Shame," is not a systemic PR problem. It's driven by a small handful of bad actors (under 20), whose high volume of low-quality output unfairly tarnishes the reputation of the entire digital PR industry.

Related Insights

The proliferation of AI-generated content has eroded consumer trust to a new low. People increasingly assume that what they see is not real, creating a significant hurdle for authentic brands that must now work harder than ever to prove their genuineness and cut through the skepticism.

As AI-generated content and virtual influencers saturate social media, consumer trust will erode, leading to 'Peak Social.' This wave of distrust will drive people away from anonymous influencers and back towards known entities and credible experts with genuine authority in their fields.

As CGI becomes photorealistic, spotting fake hardware demos is harder. An unexpected giveaway has emerged: the use of generic, AI-generated captions and descriptions. This stilted language, intended to sound professional, can ironically serve as a watermark of inauthenticity, undermining the credibility of the visuals it accompanies.

A new marketing tactic involves creating high-quality, AI-generated content on platforms like Reddit to promote a product. The goal is to have this seemingly authentic user content indexed and then surfaced by LLMs like ChatGPT in their summaries, creating an insidious and hard-to-detect marketing channel.

Marketing leaders shouldn't wait for FTC regulation to establish ethical AI guidelines. The real risk of using undisclosed AI, like virtual influencers, isn't immediate legal trouble but the long-term erosion of consumer trust. Once customers feel misled, that brand damage is incredibly difficult to repair.

The online world, particularly platforms like the former Twitter, is not a true reflection of the real world. A small percentage of users, many of whom are bots, generate the vast majority of content. This creates a distorted and often overly negative perception of public sentiment that does not represent the majority view.

When AI tools that automate low-value tasks like commenting are promoted as 'marketing,' it reinforces the negative stereotype that marketers are simply spammers. This damages the credibility of the entire profession and overshadows the strategic, value-driven work that true marketing entails.

As AI makes creating complex visuals trivial, audiences will become skeptical of content like surrealist photos or polished B-roll. They will increasingly assume it is AI-generated rather than the result of human skill, leading to lower trust and engagement.

While mainstream media covers the high-level controversy of a failed campaign, specialized trade publications dissect the granular, tactical mistakes. For practitioners, this peer review is often more damaging and insightful, as it judges the professional execution and ethical choices made behind the scenes.

Unlike professionally trained journalists, many content creators and influencers are not bound by traditional ethical standards. They may not understand or respect concepts like embargoes or "off the record," posing a risk to controlled message delivery.