A longer-than-average timeline for achieving a goal isn't a sign of failure but a necessary preparation for a greater launch, especially for an unconventional path. Comparing your journey to others is dangerous because it ignores the unique development your specific mission requires.

Related Insights

Sustainable growth requires marrying long-term patience with short-term impatience. A grand 10-year vision provides the "serotonin" of purpose, but consistent, 3-month achievements deliver the "dopamine" of progress. This dual focus keeps teams motivated and ensures the long-term plan is grounded in real-world execution.

CEO Dylan Field combats organizational slowness by interrogating project timelines. He seeks to understand the underlying assumptions and separate actual work from "well-intentionally added" padding. This forces teams to reason from first principles and justify the true time required, preventing unnecessary delays.

True quantum leaps are not incremental improvements but massive, non-linear jumps forward. A proper goal in this context should feel absurdly ambitious and even frightening, as it forces a complete change in your operational methods.

When a team presents a timeline that feels instinctively too long, trust that gut feeling. It likely signals an over-engineered solution. Complex systems never become simple; they only breed more complexity, causing timelines to expand endlessly. It's better to reset the team or the approach early on.

For ambitious 'moonshot' projects, the vast majority of time and effort (90%) is spent on learning, exploration, and discovering the right thing to build. The actual construction is a small fraction (10%) of the total work. This reframes failure as a critical and expected part of the learning process.

The most meaningful achievements (building a company, raising a family) are multi-year endeavors. In an average adult life, you only have about five or six 10-year slots for these "movements." This scarcity makes the sequencing of your life's major goals a critical strategic decision.

Entrepreneurs often view early mistakes as regrettable detours to be avoided. The proper framing is to see them as necessary, unskippable steps in development. Every fumble, pivot, and moment of uncertainty is essential preparation for what's next, transforming regret into an appreciation for the journey itself.

When pursuing significant innovation, expect a period where obstacles mount and progress stalls, making the effort seem like a failure. Leader Rosabeth Moss Cantor calls this "Cantor's Law." A strong sense of purpose and commitment to allies are essential to persevere through this "long dry spell."

Successful people with unconventional paths ('dark horses') avoid rigid five or ten-year plans. Like early-stage founders, they focus on making the best immediate choice that aligns with their fulfillment, maintaining the agility to pivot. This iterative approach consistently outperforms fixed, long-term roadmaps.

Finding entrepreneurial success often requires a decade-long period of trial and error. This phase of launching seemingly "dumb" or failed projects is not a sign of incompetence but a necessary learning curve to develop skills, judgment, and self-awareness. The key is to keep learning and taking shots.