Upfront investments in creative, development, and logistics create immense internal pressure to launch a campaign, even when fatal flaws appear late in the process. This "gravitational force" of sunk costs must be actively resisted to prevent a minor issue from becoming a public failure.

Related Insights

Agencies often pitch exciting, ambitious "North Star" campaigns that get one department excited. However, these ideas frequently fail because the client's internal teams (e.g., digital, PR, comms) are siloed and not aligned. The agency sells a vision that other departments ultimately block, leading to an inability to deliver.

When a business gets high visibility but low conversions, the impulse is to blame the platform or marketing tactic (the 'sink'). However, the real issue is often the core offering—the product, pricing, or value proposition (the 'well'). People obsess over front-end fixes when the back-end is the actual problem.

Founders often get stuck endlessly perfecting a product, believing it must be flawless before launch. This is a fallacy, as "perfection" is subjective. The correct approach is to launch early and iterate based on real market feedback, as there is no perfect time to start.

The 'Mad Men' era of relying on a creative director's gut feel is obsolete. Many leaders still wrongly judge marketing creative based on their personal taste ('I don't like that picture'). The correct modern approach is to deploy content and use the resulting performance data to make informed decisions.

Tactical launch failures often have energetic roots. A founder's shaky, uncertain energy at a project's inception can permeate the entire container, leading to poor results even with a solid strategy. The energy of the start dictates the outcome.

Creativity thrives not from pressure, but from a culture of psychological safety where experimentation is encouraged. Great thinkers often need to "sit on" a brief for weeks to let ideas incubate. Forcing immediate output stifles breakthrough campaign thinking.

Facing the same blocker repeatedly—in Kalshi's case, government rejection—is uniquely demoralizing. It causes the team to question the core strategy and leadership's judgment, leading to significant attrition and a collapse in faith that is harder to recover from than varied challenges.

Perfectionism isn't just a mindset; it's a tangible cost. It manifests as a 'time tax' through delayed projects, an 'opportunity tax' by missing market windows, and a 'confidence tax' where waiting longer erodes your self-belief instead of building it. Quantifying these costs reveals the high price of inaction.

By enforcing a strict budget cap on any single commercial, Liquid Death operates a 'small bets' strategy. This minimizes the financial risk of any one piece of content flopping and allows for a higher volume of creative outputs, ensuring the ROI is massive when a video succeeds.

To ensure continuous experimentation, Coastline's marketing head allocates a specific "failure budget" for high-risk initiatives. The philosophy is that most experiments won't work, but the few that do will generate enough value to cover all losses and open up crucial new marketing channels.

Sunk Costs Create a "Gravitational Force" That Pushes Failing Campaigns Forward | RiffOn