Deteriorating debt fundamentals are a known long-term risk, but markets often remain complacent until a specific political event, like an election or leadership change, acts as a trigger. These upheavals force an immediate re-evaluation of what is sustainable, transforming abstract fiscal worries into concrete, costly market volatility.
Related Insights
Unlike the post-GFC era, governments now lack the fiscal and monetary flexibility to cushion every economic shock due to high debt levels. This is forcing global markets to trade on their own fundamentals again, creating volatility and relative value opportunities reminiscent of the pre-2008 era.
The US is not facing a single issue but a convergence of multiple stressors. Unsustainable fiscal policy, fragile funding markets, geopolitical shifts, energy production issues, and leveraged financial players create a highly volatile environment where one failure could trigger a cascade.
Markets react sharply to clear, quantifiable events like tariff announcements but are poor early-warning signals for gradual, harder-to-price risks like the erosion of democratic norms. This creates a dangerous complacency among investors and policymakers.
Despite recent concerns about private credit quality, the most rapid and substantial growth in debt since the GFC has occurred in the government sector. This makes the government bond market, not private credit, the most likely source of a future systemic crisis, especially in a rising rate environment.
History shows a strong correlation between extreme national debt and societal breakdown. Countries that sustain a debt-to-GDP ratio over 130% for an extended period (e.g., 18 months) tend to tear themselves apart through civil war or revolution, not external attack.
While Italy has historically been a focus for political risk, the current stable government has reduced near-term concerns. The primary political risk now centers on France, where noise around the early 2027 presidential election is expected to pressure French government bond spreads in late 2026.
Historically, countries crossing a 130% debt-to-GDP ratio experience revolution or collapse. As the U.S. approaches this threshold (currently 122%), its massive debt forces zero-sum political fights over a shrinking pie, directly fueling the social unrest and polarization seen today.
The current expectation for legislative stalemate could be completely upended by a significant economic downturn. A recession would make fiscal stimulus more politically appealing to both parties, consistent with historical patterns, creating an environment for policy action that otherwise seems unlikely given the political landscape.
Despite compressed spreads and improved market access, credit markets are not complacent. Pricing for the most vulnerable emerging market sovereigns still implies a significant 17% near-term and 40% five-year probability of default. This is well above historical averages, signaling lingering investor caution and skepticism about long-term stability.
Economist Peter Schiff highlights a historical pattern where countries, except for Japan, that surpass a 130% debt-to-GDP ratio experience internal strife, such as civil war or revolution. This is due to the inability to fund government programs, leading to societal breakdown and extreme political polarization.
