While the 2008 crisis centered on commercial banks and mortgages, today's problem is rooted in the central banks themselves. The Fed's policies actively devalued US treasuries—the bedrock of the system—making this a more fundamental central banking and currency crisis, not just a banking one.
Related Insights
The Federal Reserve encouraged banks to buy long-term treasuries while signaling low rates, only to then hike rates at a historic pace. This action decimated the value of those bonds, making the world's 'safest asset' the riskiest and directly triggering bank collapses like Silicon Valley Bank.
Drawing from his time at the US Treasury, Amias Gerety explains that recessions are about slowing growth. A financial crisis is a far more dangerous event where fundamental assumptions collapse because assets previously considered safe are suddenly perceived as worthless, causing a "sudden stop" in the economy.
After a decade of zero rates and QE post-2008, the financial system can no longer function without continuous stimulus. Attempts to tighten policy, as seen with the 2018 repo crisis, immediately cause breakdowns, forcing central banks to reverse course and indicating a permanent state of intervention.
Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan points to a historical pattern preceding every major financial crisis: a U-shape in monetary policy. An extended period of easy money builds up risk, and the subsequent tightening phase triggers the collapse. This framework helps identify periods of heightened systemic vulnerability.
Unlike past crises like 2008, the coming debt sustainability crisis will be different because the government's own balance sheet is the source of the instability. This means it will lack the capacity to bail out the market in the same way, fundamentally changing the nature of the crisis.
Unlike the 2008 crisis, which was concentrated in housing and banking, today's risk is an 'everything bubble.' A decade of cheap money has simultaneously inflated stocks, real estate, crypto, and even collectibles, meaning a collapse would be far broader and more contagious.
Under "fiscal dominance," the U.S. government's massive debt dictates Federal Reserve policy. The Fed must keep rates low enough for the government to afford interest payments, even if it fuels inflation. Monetary policy is no longer about managing the economy but about preventing a debt-driven collapse, making the Fed reactive, not proactive.
For 40 years, falling rates pushed 'safe' bond funds into increasingly risky assets to chase yield. With rates now rising, these mis-categorized portfolios are the most vulnerable part of the financial system. A crisis in credit or sovereign debt is more probable than a stock-market-led crash.
The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'
In periods of 'fiscal dominance,' where government debt and deficits are high, a central bank's independence inevitably erodes. Its primary function shifts from controlling inflation to ensuring the government can finance its spending, often through financial repression like yield curve control.
