The term "agent" is overloaded. Claude Code agents excel at complex, immediate, human-supervised tasks (e.g., researching and writing a one-off PRD). In contrast, platforms like N8N or Lindy are better suited for building automated, recurring workflows that run on a schedule (e.g., daily competitor monitoring).
Related Insights
Contrary to the vision of free-wheeling autonomous agents, most business automation relies on strict Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Products like OpenAI's Agent Builder succeed by providing deterministic, node-based workflows that enforce business logic, which is more valuable than pure autonomy.
The power of tools like Claude Code comes from giving the AI access to fundamental command-line tools (e.g., `bash`, `grep`). This allows the AI to compose novel solutions and lets product teams define new features using simple English prompts rather than hard-coded logic.
The most significant productivity gains come from applying AI to every stage of development, including research, planning, product marketing, and status updates. Limiting AI to just code generation misses the larger opportunity to automate the entire engineering process.
True Agentic AI isn't a single, all-powerful bot. It's an orchestrated system of multiple, specialized agents, each performing a single task (e.g., qualifying, booking, analyzing). This 'division of labor,' mirroring software engineering principles, creates a more robust, scalable, and manageable automation pipeline.
Vercel's CTO Malte Ubl suggests a simple method for finding valuable internal automation tasks: ask people, "What do you hate most about your job?" This uncovers tedious work that requires some human judgment, making it a perfect sweet spot for the capabilities of current-generation AI agents.
Building a single, all-purpose AI is like hiring one person for every company role. To maximize accuracy and creativity, build multiple custom GPTs, each trained for a specific function like copywriting or operations, and have them collaborate.
To prevent constant interruptions from automated tasks, schedule recurring AI agents to align with your work week. For example, receive competitive research on Fridays before planning and support summaries on Mondays before the team meeting. This integrates agent output into your natural workflow.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
The ideal AI-powered engineering workflow isn't just one tool, but a fluid cycle. It involves synchronous collaboration with an AI for planning and review, then handing off to an asynchronous agent for implementation and testing, before returning to synchronous mode for the next phase.
While N8N is powerful for building complex AI agent workflows, its steep learning curve is geared towards engineers. Product Managers will find Lindy.ai more effective because it allows for agent creation through simple AI prompts, removing the technical barrier and speeding up prototyping.
