The "SaaSpocalypse" narrative misses a key reason large enterprises buy from vendors like Salesforce. It's not just about features, but accountability—like hiring McKinsey, it provides "air cover" and "a throat to choke." This institutional trust is a powerful moat against nascent, AI-generated tools.

Related Insights

Traditional SaaS switching costs were based on painful data migrations, which LLMs may now automate. The new moat for AI companies is creating deep, customized integrations into a customer's unique operational workflows. This is achieved through long, hands-on pilot periods that make the AI solution indispensable and hard to replace.

As AI commoditizes user interfaces, enduring value will reside in the backend systems that are the authoritative source of data (e.g., payroll, financial records). These 'systems of record' are sticky due to regulation, business process integration, and high switching costs.

When asked if AI commoditizes software, Bravo argues that durable moats aren't just code, which can be replicated. They are the deep understanding of customer processes and the ability to service them. This involves re-engineering organizations, not just deploying a product.

Investor Mitchell Green argues that the fear of AI "vibe coding" away SaaS businesses is overblown. Incumbents like Workday spent decades building trust and deep enterprise integrations, a moat that can't be easily replicated with code alone, regardless of AI's power.

According to Box CEO Aaron Levie, the stickiest SaaS products are those with strong network effects, deep integrations, and mission-critical workflows. A simple heuristic for vulnerability: if you can get the same value from a fresh install as a decade-old one, your product can be easily replaced by AI-generated software.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff claims large language models (LLMs) are becoming commoditized infrastructure, analogous to disk drives. He believes the idea of a specific model providing a sustainable competitive advantage ('moat') has 'expired,' suggesting long-term value will shift to applications, proprietary data, and distribution.

AI doesn't kill all software; it bifurcates the market. Companies with strong moats like distribution, proprietary data, and enterprise lock-in will thrive by integrating AI. However, companies whose only advantage was their software code will be wiped out as AI makes the code itself a commodity. The moat is no longer the software.

Incumbent SaaS companies like Salesforce are cutting off API access to prevent AI startups from siphoning value. To build a durable business, new AI companies cannot simply be a "system of action" on top of old platforms; they must aim to become the new system of record, which requires building complex data migration tools from day one.

In enterprise AI, competitive advantage comes less from the underlying model and more from the surrounding software. Features like versioning, analytics, integrations, and orchestration systems are critical for enterprise adoption and create stickiness that models alone cannot.

Defensible companies build systems of record (like an ERP) that are so integral to a customer's operations that switching is prohibitively difficult. This creates a 'hostage' dynamic, providing a powerful moat against competitors, even those with better AI features.

Legacy SaaS like Salesforce Is Hired for Corporate "Air Cover," a Moat AI Can't Replicate | RiffOn