Incumbent SaaS companies like Salesforce are cutting off API access to prevent AI startups from siphoning value. To build a durable business, new AI companies cannot simply be a "system of action" on top of old platforms; they must aim to become the new system of record, which requires building complex data migration tools from day one.

Related Insights

Traditional SaaS switching costs were based on painful data migrations, which LLMs may now automate. The new moat for AI companies is creating deep, customized integrations into a customer's unique operational workflows. This is achieved through long, hands-on pilot periods that make the AI solution indispensable and hard to replace.

Incumbent companies are slowed by the need to retrofit AI into existing processes and tribal knowledge. AI-native startups, however, can build their entire operational model around agent-based, prompt-driven workflows from day one, creating a structural advantage that is difficult for larger companies to copy.

Counter to fears that foundation models will obsolete all apps, AI startups can build defensible businesses by embedding AI into unique workflows, owning the customer relationship, and creating network effects. This mirrors how top App Store apps succeeded despite Apple's platform dominance.

Simply adding an AI layer on top of a traditional SaaS stack will fail. A true AI-native architecture requires an "AI data layer" sitting next to the "AI application layer," both controlled by ML engineers who need to constantly tune data ingestion and processing without dependencies on the core tech team.

Incumbents face the innovator's dilemma; they can't afford to scrap existing infrastructure for AI. Startups can build "AI-native" from a clean sheet, creating a fundamental advantage that legacy players can't replicate by just bolting on features.

A single feature advantage is insufficient for an AI startup to displace a software giant like Salesforce. True disruption requires a fundamental shift across user interface (proactive agents vs. forms), data utilization (unstructured data), and business model (monetizing tasks vs. seats).

The shift to AI creates an opening in every established software category (ERP, CRM, etc.). While incumbents are adding AI features, new AI-native startups have an advantage in winning over net-new, 'greenfield' customers who are choosing their first system of record.

To transition to AI, leaders must ruthlessly dismantle parts of their existing, money-making codebase that are not competitively differentiating or slow down AI development. This requires overcoming the team's justifiable pride and emotional attachment to legacy systems they built.

To succeed in the AI era, SaaS companies cannot just add AI features. They must undergo a 'brutal' transformation, changing everything from their org chart and GTM strategy to their core metrics and pricing model. This is a non-negotiable, foundational shift.

An AI app that is merely a wrapper around a foundation model is at high risk of being absorbed by the model provider. True defensibility comes from integrating AI with proprietary data and workflows to become an indispensable enterprise system of record, like an HR or CRM system.