Large enterprises operate on complex webs of legacy systems, compliance controls, and fragile integrations. Their high risk aversion and lengthy change management cycles create a powerful inertia that will significantly delay the replacement of established B2B software, regardless of how capable AI agents become. Enterprise architecture moves slower than market hype.
The fundamental business model of many SaaS companies is based on per-user pricing. AI agents pose an existential threat to this model by enabling smaller teams to achieve the same output as larger ones. As companies wonder why they should pay for 100 seats when 10 people can do the work, the entire economic foundation of the SaaS industry faces a crisis.
The disruption to software isn't just about professional developers. It's about non-technical employees, like sales executives, using AI tools like Claude to build functional internal applications that replace paid SaaS products. This trend democratizes software creation and directly undermines the traditional SaaS business model from within customer organizations.
If AI agents are delegated to choose the optimal software for a task, they will constantly evaluate and switch between vendors based on performance and cost. This dynamic breaks the long-term customer relationships and enterprise lock-in that SaaS companies rely on, effectively commoditizing the software market and destroying brand loyalty.
AI doesn't kill all software; it bifurcates the market. Companies with strong moats like distribution, proprietary data, and enterprise lock-in will thrive by integrating AI. However, companies whose only advantage was their software code will be wiped out as AI makes the code itself a commodity. The moat is no longer the software.
When you're the market leader, the strongest response to a competitor's jab is indifference, like Don Draper's "I don't think about you at all." OpenAI's lengthy, serious rebuttal to Anthropic's ad amplified the attack and made them look defensive, which is the opposite of how a dominant player should behave.
By framing its competitor's potential ads as a "betrayal," Anthropic's Super Bowl campaign reinforced the public's negative perception of AI as another manipulative tech scheme. This damaged the industry's overall reputation in a country already highly skeptical of the technology, turning the attack into friendly fire.