Billions spent on border security hardware are a less effective use of funds than foreign aid. The same resources invested in stabilizing migrant populations in the first countries they flee to—supporting local healthcare, jobs, and schools—could prevent onward migration to the West for a fraction of the cost.

Related Insights

Beyond its long-term growth benefits, rational immigration policy can be a powerful short-term tool against inflation. By addressing labor shortages in critical sectors like construction, agriculture, and elder care, an increased and targeted immigrant workforce can directly reduce cost pressures on essential goods and services.

Instead of focusing on confrontational deportations, the most effective way to curb illegal immigration is to eliminate the job opportunities that attract people. By aggressively fining and jailing business owners who hire undocumented workers, the primary motivation for crossing the border would be removed, solving the problem at its source.

Despite dismantling traditional aid programs to save taxpayer money, Trump's new strategy of bailing out allies, countering China, and securing supply chains is projected to be incredibly expensive. This new approach of weaponized aid could ultimately exceed previous USAID spending levels, contradicting its cost-saving premise.

Labor migration isn't just a rich-country issue. Many nations in the Global South, including in the Caribbean, South America, and Africa, face their own workforce shortages. This creates opportunities for regional, South-South migration policies that could boost local economies without involving Europe or the US.

Government-administered aid programs are often highly inefficient, with significant overhead costs meaning only "cents on the dollar" reach the intended recipients. A more effective solution is to provide direct cash transfers or vouchers, empowering individuals to spend the money within the existing private market.

An aid agency's budget is dwarfed by a host country's ministry spending. Therefore, instead of running parallel programs, the most impactful approach is "system strengthening": working directly with local government to integrate evidence and optimize how they allocate their own, much larger, budgets.

Many temporary workers would prefer to return home between jobs but remain in a host country illegally because they fear the high cost and danger of re-entering for the next work season. Creating safe, legal, and reliable re-entry pathways could significantly reduce irregular overstays.

Framing immigration solely as a moral imperative leads to impractical policies by ignoring crucial factors like resource allocation, cultural integration, and public consent. A pragmatic approach balances humanitarianism with national interest, preventing unsustainable outcomes and social friction.

The narrative of mass migration to wealthy Western countries is misleading. The vast majority of migrants move to neighboring countries. They only undertake perilous, long-distance journeys when conditions in those initial host nations deteriorate, often due to a lack of international support for those frontline states.

Congressman Ro Khanna argues that not all deficit spending is equal. Spending on programs like healthcare and education can be justified as 'productive investments' if their long-term rate of return for society is higher than the initial cost, distinguishing them from non-productive spending.