Beyond its long-term growth benefits, rational immigration policy can be a powerful short-term tool against inflation. By addressing labor shortages in critical sectors like construction, agriculture, and elder care, an increased and targeted immigrant workforce can directly reduce cost pressures on essential goods and services.

Related Insights

While tariffs affect goods prices, immigration controls are reducing the labor supply, particularly in the service sector. This creates upward wage and price pressure on services, a subtle but significant contributor to overall inflation that is difficult to isolate in real-time data.

Contrary to common political narratives, undocumented immigrants are often a net positive for government finances. They are heavily documented for tax purposes (e.g., Social Security) and pay into these systems but are less likely to draw benefits, effectively subsidizing programs for citizens and creating a highly profitable workforce.

The primary economic concern is not a cyclical recession but a structural slowdown in the economy's underlying trend growth. This is driven by long-term factors like restrictive immigration policies that impact labor supply and productivity, creating a persistent headwind even without a formal downturn.

Developed nations are building massive infrastructure projects like data centers, yet the construction workforce is aging and shrinking. This creates a critical bottleneck, as every project fundamentally relies on excavator operators—a role younger generations are avoiding.

Contrary to narratives about excess demand, the recent inflationary period was primarily driven by supply-side shocks from COVID-related disruptions. Evidence, such as the New York Fed's supply disruption index accurately predicting inflation's trajectory, supports this view over a purely demand-driven explanation.

America intentionally avoided solving illegal immigration because it serves a crucial economic purpose: providing a flexible, cheap labor force that doesn't draw on social safety nets. This benefits industries and consumers while placing little burden on the state.

Data from 2004-2023 reveals low unemployment in occupations that heavily utilize H-1B visas, such as tech and engineering. This suggests that foreign workers are filling a talent gap rather than displacing a large number of available American workers, challenging the narrative that immigration is a primary cause of job loss in these sectors.

Restricting immigration halts a key source of labor for essential sectors like agriculture and construction. This drives up consumer costs and could cut GDP by 4-7%, creating a direct path to higher inflation and slower economic growth.

Immigration policy must account for economic incentives. Unlike in the past, modern welfare states make immigration an economically rational choice for survival, not just opportunity. This shifts the dynamic, attracting individuals based on benefits rather than a desire to contribute without a safety net.

Beyond immediate labor supply issues, restrictive immigration policies, such as for H-1B visas and students, could have pernicious, long-term negative effects on US productivity. By limiting access to high-skilled talent, these policies threaten the country's technological edge and overall trend growth.