Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To fix performance issues, managers can facilitate a team-based retrospective. The 'Seeds, Weeds, Needs' framework helps reps identify what worked (Seeds), what was ineffective (Weeds), and what new actions are required (Needs). This empowers the team to collaboratively diagnose and solve its own problems.

Related Insights

Instead of one-off workshops, this systematic approach first diagnoses root causes with data and interviews. It then implements targeted 6-8 week "sprints" to fix those issues, followed by installing long-term systems to ensure sustained growth and operational excellence.

To break the 'crush it or drown' cycle, perform a structured quarterly audit of your activities. Identify what worked (seeds), what failed (weeds), and what you should start doing (needs). This reveals the specific behaviors driving your results.

Encourage team members to take five minutes at day's end for a personal "after action report." They reflect on whether they achieved their daily goal without management oversight. This private self-assessment fosters accountability and a habit of continuous improvement.

To encourage a sales team to be more aggressive and take risks, leaders must make it safe to fail. A powerful tactic is to hold regular meetings where the team collectively analyzes both a won and a lost deal. This removes the stigma of failure and transforms individual losses into collective learning opportunities.

Instead of telling a rep to "book more meetings," analyze their process and identify the specific micro-step where they are failing, such as getting past the first 15 seconds of a cold call. Focus all coaching efforts exclusively on improving that single, specific action to fix the larger outcome.

To make post-mortems on lost deals effective, sales and product teams must collaborate to identify root causes. The meeting's primary goal should be to produce a specific, actionable change in the sales process or product roadmap, rather than just discussing the failure.

Effective coaching follows a three-step process: Identify a metric-based performance gap, validate the specific rep behaviors causing it, and then co-create a coaching plan focused on improving those behaviors, not just the lagging metric.

Instead of a generic strategy overhaul, leaders should first diagnose the root cause. If the sales team is active but results are poor, it's an execution or skill issue needing coaching. If activity itself is low, it's a focus and prioritization problem requiring a reset.

When results lag, avoid throwing out your entire sales strategy. Instead, diagnose the problem by examining the micro-activities: your follow-up cadence, value proposition messaging, ICP definition, and questions asked. Often, a small tweak to one component is all that's needed to fix the macro problem.

Use the GROW model (Goal, Reality, Options, Way Forward) to structure coaching conversations. This simple set of question categories helps leaders guide their team members to find their own solutions, fostering independence and critical thinking without the leader needing to provide the answer directly.