Instead of relying on subjective scores from frameworks like RICE, use a simple "What and Why" statement for each feature. This narrative approach, which includes a "Why now?" justification, provides clearer strategic alignment and is more persuasive for stakeholders than an abstract number.
Related Insights
To evaluate ideas without getting bogged down, use a simple framework: What is the idea? Why is it important? Who will it impact? Explicitly avoiding the 'how' prevents premature criticism and focuses the discussion on strategic value.
Not all design impact can be quantified with metrics. When data is unavailable, frame your value by highlighting contributions to competitive parity, internal team efficiency, or bug reduction. This holistic view of business health resonates with leadership beyond just product managers.
Technologists often fail to get project approval by focusing on specs and data. A successful pitch requires a "narrative algorithm" that addresses five key drivers: empathy, engagement, alignment, evidence, and impact. This framework translates technical achievements into a compelling business story for leadership.
Instead of waiting for features to build a story, develop the compelling narrative the market needs to hear first. This story then guides the launch strategy and influences the roadmap, with product functionality serving as supporting proof points, not the centerpiece.
Instead of complex prioritization frameworks like RICE, designers can use a more intuitive model based on Value, Cost, and Risk. This mirrors the mental calculation humans use for everyday decisions, allowing for a more holistic and natural conversation about project trade-offs.
Go beyond visual roadmaps. Create a monthly written document for executives that explains *why* the roadmap changed, details priorities, and includes data from recent launches. This forces intentionality, builds trust, and fosters deeper, more accountable conversations with leadership.
As companies scale, roadmaps become a list of stakeholder commitments. To maintain focus, leaders must relentlessly communicate the "why" behind every initiative and tie it to a clear investment ROI. This ensures all teams are running in the same direction, not just checking boxes.
While frameworks like RICE appear scientific, their inputs are highly subjective. Their primary value isn't for making decisions, but for providing a seemingly objective, data-driven justification to decline stakeholder or management feature requests that don't align with the current strategy.
A simple but powerful framework for any product initiative requires answering four questions: 1) What is it? 2) Why does it matter (financially)? 3) How much will it cost (including hiring and ops)? 4) When do I get it? This forces teams to think through the full business impact, not just the user value.
Don't build a feature roadmap and then write OKRs to justify it. Instead, start with the outcome you want to achieve (e.g., "move metric X to Y"). This frames all features as experiments designed to hit that goal, empowering teams to kill features that don't deliver value.
