The explosion in the number of solo GPs and small VC funds is not primarily fueled by institutions, but by a growing pool of individual and high-net-worth capital. This new LP base will demand fund structures with better liquidity and less administrative burden.
Related Insights
The key innovation of evergreen funds for individual investors isn't just liquidity, but the upfront, fully-funded structure. This removes the operational complexity of managing capital calls and distributions—a major historical barrier for even wealthy individuals who found the process too complicated.
The old VC mindset of "let your winners run" and waiting for an IPO is gone. Today's GPs must act as fiduciaries by creating liquidity plans, proactively orchestrating secondary sales, and navigating complex buyout deals with partial rollovers to generate returns for LPs.
VC funds between $50M and a few hundred million can be a 'dead zone' for general partners. They are too large to benefit from the quick-carry potential of small funds but too small to generate significant management fees like mega-funds, making the personal economics challenging for managers.
The fund-of-funds model, often seen as outdated, finds a modern edge by focusing on small, emerging VC managers. These funds offer the highest potential returns but are difficult for most LPs to source, evaluate, and access. This creates a specialized niche for fund-of-funds that can navigate this opaque market segment effectively.
The path from angel to large fund manager doesn't require a traditional start. When personal capital runs out, using SPVs for high-demand deals builds a track record and LP relationships. This deal-driven, bottoms-up approach can organically lead to raising a dedicated fund.
The rigid 10-year fund model is outdated for companies staying private longer. The future is permanent capital vehicles with hedge fund-like structures, offering long durations and built-in redemption features for LPs who need liquidity.
The AI boom is masking a broader trend: venture fundraising is at its lowest in 10 years. The 2021-22 period created an unsustainable number of new, small funds. Now, both LPs and founders are favoring established, long-term firms, causing capital to re-concentrate and the total number of funds to shrink.
The venture capital landscape is bifurcating. Large, multi-stage funds leverage scale and network, while small, boutique funds win with deep domain expertise. Mid-sized generalist funds lack a clear competitive edge and risk getting squeezed out by these two dominant models.
Before GPs can successfully tap into the retail market, they must recognize the immense operational costs. Managing, reporting for, and administering funds with thousands of small investors has a high break-even point. Without the ability to achieve significant scale, the economics of these products are unworkable.
With fund lifecycles stretching well beyond the traditional 10 years, LPs are increasingly seeking liquidity through secondary sales. This trend isn't just a sign of pressure but a necessary market evolution to manage illiquid, long-duration assets.
