The justification for accelerating AI development to beat China is logically flawed. It assumes the victor wields a controllable tool. In reality, both nations are racing to build the same uncontrollable AI, making the race itself, not the competitor, the primary existential threat.

Chinese policymakers champion AI as a key driver of economic productivity but appear to be underestimating its potential for social upheaval. There is little indication they are planning for the mass displacement of the gig economy workforce, who will be the first casualties of automation. This focus on technological gains over social safety nets creates a significant future political risk.

China’s economic strategy prioritizes technology and manufacturing competitiveness, assuming this will create a virtuous cycle of profits, jobs, and consumption. The key risk is that automated, high-tech manufacturing may not generate enough jobs to significantly boost household income, causing consumer spending to lag behind industrial growth.

China's aggressive adoption of AI and robotics has led to high youth unemployment alongside cheap, high-quality services. This scenario, sustained by family savings and cultural homogeneity, may offer a blueprint for how Western societies could function in a post-AI world with fewer traditional jobs.

For Chinese policymakers, AI is more than a productivity tool; it represents a crucial opportunity to escape the middle-income trap. They are betting that leadership in AI can fuel the innovation needed to transition from a labor-intensive economy to a developed one, avoiding the stagnation that has plagued other emerging markets.

China's greatest asset in the AI race is its human capital. It produces the world's largest number of STEM graduates, creating a deep talent pool of engineers and scientists that makes it a formidable, long-term competitor to the United States.

Marc Andreessen argues that AI isn't a job threat but a necessary solution. It arrives just as declining population growth and 50 years of slow technological progress in the physical economy would have otherwise led to economic stagnation and decline. AI and robotics are needed to fill the labor gap.

While the US focuses on creating the most advanced AI models, China's real strength may be its proven ability to orchestrate society-wide technology adoption. Deep integration and widespread public enthusiasm for AI could ultimately provide a more durable competitive advantage.

Many countries, including China, are facing a demographic crisis with falling birth rates and an aging population. This creates an economic imbalance with too few young workers to support the elderly. AI and robotics can fill this gap, effectively becoming the "young workforce" that sustains these economies.