Marc Andreessen argues that AI isn't a job threat but a necessary solution. It arrives just as declining population growth and 50 years of slow technological progress in the physical economy would have otherwise led to economic stagnation and decline. AI and robotics are needed to fill the labor gap.
Related Insights
Contrary to common fears, AI is projected to be a net job creator. Citing a World Economic Forum study, Naveen Chaddha highlights that while 92 million jobs will be displaced by automation, 170 million new roles will emerge, resulting in a net gain of 78 million jobs by 2030.
Contrary to the feeling of rapid technological change, economic data shows productivity growth has been extremely low for 50 years. AI is not just another incremental improvement; it's a potential shock to a long-stagnant system, which is crucial context for its impact.
Contrary to fears of mass unemployment, AI will create massive deflationary pressure, making goods and services cheaper. This will allow people to support their lifestyles by working fewer hours and retiring earlier, leading to a labor shortage as new AI-driven industries simultaneously create new jobs.
The narrative of AI destroying jobs misses a key point: AI allows companies to 'hire software for a dollar' for tasks that were never economical to assign to humans. This will unlock new services and expand the economy, creating demand in areas that previously didn't exist.
AI's impact on labor will likely follow a deceptive curve: an initial boost in productivity as it augments human workers, followed by a crash as it masters their domains and replaces them entirely. This creates a false sense of security, delaying necessary policy responses.
Rather than causing mass unemployment, AI's productivity gains will lead to shorter work weeks and more leisure time. This shift creates new economic opportunities and jobs in sectors that cater to this expanded free time, like live events and hospitality, thus rebalancing the labor market.
AI's arrival is serendipitous, providing the necessary productivity boost and labor substitution to counteract a future of economic shrinkage caused by declining global populations. Without AI, we'd be facing a crisis.
The labor market faces a dual threat. Weak demand, linked to tariffs and deglobalization, has already pushed job growth to zero. As AI adoption accelerates productivity, it could further suppress labor demand, potentially tipping the economy into a state of net job decline.
David Solomon dismisses the "job apocalypse" theory. For Goldman Sachs, AI-driven efficiency creates capacity. This freed-up capacity will be reinvested into growth initiatives that were previously constrained, which he believes will ultimately drive more job creation over time, not less.
Many countries, including China, are facing a demographic crisis with falling birth rates and an aging population. This creates an economic imbalance with too few young workers to support the elderly. AI and robotics can fill this gap, effectively becoming the "young workforce" that sustains these economies.