The most effective way to lower housing prices is to increase supply. Instead of artificially freezing rents, which discourages investment, policymakers should remove regulations that make building new units difficult. More construction creates more competition, which naturally drives down prices for everyone.

Bilyeu points to Houston as an example where heavy deregulation in housing has led to a large supply, keeping both rent and home prices relatively flat. He contrasts this with highly regulated markets where prices skyrocket, locking people out of the economic system.

In land-rich countries like Canada, the primary cause of soaring housing costs is not a lack of land, labor, or materials. Instead, government-imposed costs—including taxes, development fees, and slow, bureaucratic permitting processes—make up the vast majority of the price of a new home.

In a competitive free market, corporate greed is a positive force. The desire for profit maximization compels companies to offer better products and services at lower prices than their rivals to win customers' money. This "greed" directly translates into improved value and a higher standard of living for consumers.

Housing scarcity is a bottom-up cycle where homeowners' financial incentive is to protect their property value (NIMBYism). They then vote for politicians who enact restrictive building policies, turning personal financial interests into systemic regulatory bottlenecks.

After President Javier Milei deregulated rental policies, landlords who had kept properties vacant flooded the market. This massive supply increase caused inflation-adjusted rents to fall by up to 40%, demonstrating that removing price controls, not imposing them, can solve housing shortages.

Counter to the goals of rent control, Argentina's move to deregulate its rental market had a positive effect. Disincentivized landlords flooded the market with properties, increasing supply by over 170%. This surge caused inflation-adjusted rents to fall by up to 40%, demonstrating classic supply-and-demand economics.

Drew Warshaw frames the "Not In My Backyard" (NIMBY) phenomenon as a rational, if selfish, economic decision. Incumbent homeowners are incentivized to restrict new housing supply because basic economics suggest that increasing supply could decrease the value of their primary asset: their home.

The housing crisis is primarily a supply problem manufactured by regulation. National studies show that permits, fees, and zoning delays account for 25% of a single-family home's price and over 40% of an apartment's cost. Deregulation is the most direct path to solving the affordability crisis.