The most effective way to lower housing prices is to increase supply. Instead of artificially freezing rents, which discourages investment, policymakers should remove regulations that make building new units difficult. More construction creates more competition, which naturally drives down prices for everyone.

The difference in home price trends between US regions is not about weather or jobs, but housing supply. States in the South and West that permit widespread new construction are seeing prices fall, while "Not In My Backyard" (NIMBY) states in the Northeast and Midwest face shortages and rising prices.

High home prices should not be interpreted as a sign of a healthy market. Instead, they indicate a system that is malfunctioning as designed, where artificial scarcity created by policy and corporate buying drives prices up. This reflects a structural failure, not robust economic demand.

After President Javier Milei deregulated rental policies, landlords who had kept properties vacant flooded the market. This massive supply increase caused inflation-adjusted rents to fall by up to 40%, demonstrating that removing price controls, not imposing them, can solve housing shortages.

Austin's falling home values, caused by a massive expansion of housing supply, are a feature, not a bug. This 'demise' makes the city more affordable, attracting young workers and families and securing its future economic vitality, unlike supply-constrained legacy cities.

Counter to the goals of rent control, Argentina's move to deregulate its rental market had a positive effect. Disincentivized landlords flooded the market with properties, increasing supply by over 170%. This surge caused inflation-adjusted rents to fall by up to 40%, demonstrating classic supply-and-demand economics.

The housing crisis is primarily a supply problem manufactured by regulation. National studies show that permits, fees, and zoning delays account for 25% of a single-family home's price and over 40% of an apartment's cost. Deregulation is the most direct path to solving the affordability crisis.

Despite massive population growth, Austin has seen rents and housing prices decrease for three consecutive years. This is a direct result of a pro-development stance that allows supply to meet demand, a model Democratic-run cities often resist.

The history of rent control in New York City shows how price caps disincentivize maintenance and new construction. This leads to a death spiral of deteriorating housing stock, supply shortages, abandonment, and ultimately higher market rents for any new, uncontrolled units.