Large-scale government furloughs didn't cause a significant increase in unemployment claims. The reason is that affected workers received six months or more of advance notice and severance. This extended period allowed many to find new employment before their benefits ran out, while others opted for retirement, muting the impact on jobless data.
October's jobs report will likely show a significant drop in federal employment, independent of the shutdown. This is due to an estimated 80,000-100,000 workers who took voluntary buyouts earlier in the year and remained on payroll only until the fiscal year ended in September.
Companies have already pulled all available levers to manage costs short of layoffs, including halting hiring, cutting hours, and reducing temporary staff. Therefore, the persistently low layoff rate is the last defense holding the economy back from a recession. Any significant increase in layoffs would signal this firewall has broken.
The official unemployment rate is misleadingly low because when disgruntled workers give up looking for a job, they exit the labor force and are no longer counted as 'unemployed.' This artificially improves the headline number while masking underlying economic weakness and anger among young job seekers.
Despite causing significant personal hardship, government shutdowns have a minimal and short-lived impact on overall GDP. Lost federal worker pay is quickly restored upon reopening, and most economic activity catches up, making the net effect a near wash over subsequent quarters.
State-level unemployment insurance data, available during the government shutdown, shows a distinct trend. Initial claims are low (companies aren't laying people off), but continuing claims are elevated (it's hard for the unemployed to find new jobs), confirming a stagnant labor market.
Laid-off workers are increasingly turning to gig platforms like Uber instead of filing for unemployment. This trend artificially suppresses unemployment insurance (UI) claims, making this historically reliable indicator less effective at signaling rising joblessness and the true state of the labor market.
While mass firings of federal workers may not significantly alter overall payroll statistics, their real impact is a potential shock to consumer and business confidence. This second-order effect on sentiment is a key underappreciated risk that the market has not fully priced into the US dollar.
The economic cost of a government shutdown is not gradual. It is negligible for the first two weeks, becomes tangible at three to four weeks as paychecks are missed, and grows exponentially after a month as critical government services and benefits begin to break down, causing widespread disruption.
A wave of federal job cuts structured as "deferred resignations" did not spike unemployment insurance (UI) claims because they were classified as voluntary departures, making workers ineligible. This technicality masks the true labor market impact, which instead appears in claims from laid-off private-sector government contractors.
High-profile layoff announcements, like those from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, often don't correlate with US unemployment claims. This is because the announcements are frequently global, may include the elimination of unfilled roles rather than actual firings, and have murky implementation timelines, making them an unreliable leading indicator.