October's jobs report will likely show a significant drop in federal employment, independent of the shutdown. This is due to an estimated 80,000-100,000 workers who took voluntary buyouts earlier in the year and remained on payroll only until the fiscal year ended in September.
Related Insights
The recent government shutdown will create a permanent void in crucial economic data for October. While statistics like payrolls might be collected retroactively, survey-based data such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and household unemployment figures are likely lost forever due to recall bias, creating a black hole in the historical record.
A shutdown doesn't just delay data reports; if it extends into mid-month, it prevents the government from conducting the surveys needed for future reports. This disrupts the entire data collection pipeline, causing a ripple effect that can obscure economic trends for months after the government reopens.
While furloughed federal employees are typically guaranteed back pay after a shutdown, government contractors are often not. These individuals, who perform similar work without the same protections, face a permanent loss of income, highlighting a significant and often overlooked inequity in how shutdown risks are distributed.
State-level unemployment insurance data, available during the government shutdown, shows a distinct trend. Initial claims are low (companies aren't laying people off), but continuing claims are elevated (it's hard for the unemployed to find new jobs), confirming a stagnant labor market.
The most significant danger of a prolonged government shutdown is the disruption to federal statistics. This creates an "unsettling" lack of visibility for policymakers, potentially causing them to miss a critical economic downturn and delay a necessary response. The direct GDP impact is often recoverable later.
Shutdowns halt the release of key data like jobs reports and inflation figures. This obstructs the Federal Reserve's ability to make informed interest rate decisions, creating market uncertainty. It also delays Social Security COLA calculations, impacting millions of retirees who rely on that data.
While mass firings of federal workers may not significantly alter overall payroll statistics, their real impact is a potential shock to consumer and business confidence. This second-order effect on sentiment is a key underappreciated risk that the market has not fully priced into the US dollar.
The economic cost of a government shutdown is not gradual. It is negligible for the first two weeks, becomes tangible at three to four weeks as paychecks are missed, and grows exponentially after a month as critical government services and benefits begin to break down, causing widespread disruption.
A wave of federal job cuts structured as "deferred resignations" did not spike unemployment insurance (UI) claims because they were classified as voluntary departures, making workers ineligible. This technicality masks the true labor market impact, which instead appears in claims from laid-off private-sector government contractors.
A recent White House memo indicates that employees in departments reliant on discretionary funding could be permanently dismissed, unlike typical shutdowns where workers are furloughed and retain jobs. This introduces a new, more severe labor market risk that could negatively impact the dollar.