Many leaders focus on data for backward-looking reporting, treating it like infrastructure. The real value comes from using data strategically for prediction and prescription. This requires foundational investment in technology, architecture, and machine learning capabilities to forecast what will happen and what actions to take.
Related Insights
Hedge funds have a constant, daily need to make informed buy, sell, or hold decisions, creating a clear business problem that data solves. Corporations often lack this frequent, high-stakes decision-making cycle, making the value proposition of external data less immediate and harder to justify.
The biggest failure of BI tools is analysis paralysis. The most effective AI data platforms solve this by distilling all company KPIs into a single daily email or Slack message that contains one clear, unambiguous action item for the team to execute.
The primary barrier to deploying AI agents at scale isn't the models but poor data infrastructure. The vast majority of organizations have immature data systems—uncatalogued, siloed, or outdated—making them unprepared for advanced AI and setting them up for failure.
Data's role is to reveal reality and identify problems or opportunities (the "what" and "where"). It cannot prescribe the solution. The creative, inventive process of design is still required to determine "how" to solve the problem effectively.
Many leaders mistakenly halt AI adoption while waiting for perfect data governance. This is a strategic error. Organizations should immediately identify and implement the hundreds of high-value generative AI use cases that require no access to proprietary data, creating immediate wins while larger data initiatives continue.
C-suites are more motivated to adopt AI for revenue-generating "front office" activities (like investment analysis) than for cost-saving "back office" automation. The direct, tangible impact on making more money overcomes the organizational inertia that often stalls efficiency-focused technology deployments.
When approached by large labs for licensing deals, GI's founder advises against simply selling the data. He argues the only way to accurately value a unique dataset is to model it yourself to understand its true capabilities. Without this, founders risk massively undervaluing their core asset, as its potential is unknown.
The primary reason multi-million dollar AI initiatives stall or fail is not the sophistication of the models, but the underlying data layer. Traditional data infrastructure creates delays in moving and duplicating information, preventing the real-time, comprehensive data access required for AI to deliver business value. The focus on algorithms misses this foundational roadblock.
Instead of starting with available data, marketers should first identify and rank key business decisions by their potential financial impact. This decision-first approach ensures data collection and analysis efforts are focused on what truly drives business value, preventing 'analysis paralysis' and resource waste.
The excitement around AI capabilities often masks the real hurdle to enterprise adoption: infrastructure. Success is not determined by the model's sophistication, but by first solving foundational problems of security, cost control, and data integration. This requires a shift from an application-centric to an infrastructure-first mindset.
