The biggest hurdle to effective delegation is the prideful belief that doing a task yourself is superior. While true for the first attempt, it ignores the compounding value of teaching someone. The hundredth time they do it, they will be better, and you will have saved immense time.
Related Insights
The primary reason people fail to delegate is the correct belief that they can do a task faster and better themselves the first time. The key is to accept this initial time cost as a necessary investment in long-term leverage and compounding efficiency, rather than a reason to avoid delegating.
It is almost always faster and better to do a task yourself once. However, this is a trap. The "cardinal sin" is failing to invest the extra upfront effort to delegate and train someone, which unlocks compounded time savings and prevents you from ever having to do that task again.
Effective delegation isn't just handing off a task. It's about codifying your personal preferences and decision-making process into a repeatable algorithm. This allows an assistant to replicate your desired outcomes autonomously over time, moving beyond simple task completion to genuine leverage.
Many feel guilty offloading tasks. Instead, view delegation as a gift. You are creating a job, providing income, and offering someone the opportunity to master a craft and find meaning in their work. This reframe turns a psychological barrier into a positive act.
When auditing your tasks, apply a brutal filter: unless it requires your unique strategic thinking ("your brain") or your personal communication ("your voice"), you don't personally need to do it. It can be delegated or automated.
Creators who feel they're 'too good' to hire help often suffer from a training failure, not a talent gap. Instead of replacing yourself, deconstruct your workflow. Delegate routine tasks (research, initial edits) to free yourself for the highest-value creative work.
Novice delegators assign tasks ('plan a dinner party'). Expert delegators teach their personal algorithm ('Here's how I think about dinner parties: 6-8 people, diverse interests, etc.'). Providing your process and thinking allows for better execution and refinement over time.
Many leaders "abdicate" tasks by handing them off and mentally disengaging, leading to frustration when results fail. True delegation is an active process requiring structured training, clear expectations (what, how, when), and scheduled follow-ups, which can often take months to properly implement.
Top performers' primary need is opportunities for growth, not necessarily promotion. Delegating significant responsibilities forces them to develop new skills and fosters a sense of ownership, which is more valuable than simply clearing your own plate.
Founders often feel guilty delegating tasks they could do themselves. A powerful mental shift is to see delegation not as offloading work, but as providing a desirable, well-paying job to someone in the developing world who is eager for the opportunity.