We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Countries are dismantling international free trade rules and adopting protectionist, zero-sum policies. Domestically, however, they are largely continuing with liberal, market-based economic policies, creating a new hybrid world order.
The US is actively dismantling the global systems it created (free trade, collective security), making it the primary driver of global uncertainty, not external challengers like China.
The post-1980s neoliberal consensus of small government and free trade is being replaced by a mercantilist approach. Governments, particularly the U.S., now actively intervene to protect domestic industries and secure geopolitical strength, treating trade as a zero-sum game. This represents a fundamental economic shift for investors.
Nations increasingly use sanctions and tariffs as weapons, risking a destructive race to the bottom. A new international doctrine is needed to establish rules of engagement for economic statecraft, much like the Geneva Conventions govern military conflict, to preserve the global economy.
The Western belief that free trade would cause authoritarian states like China to liberalize has proven false. Instead, this policy created a powerful manufacturing competitor whose interests diverge from the West's. The current era of deglobalization is an unwinding of this flawed foundational premise of the post-war order.
To thrive economically, a nation should pursue two seemingly contradictory paths simultaneously. Domestically, it should deregulate to foster innovation and become an attractive place to build. Internationally, it must use interventionist policies like tariffs to protect its industries from countries that do not operate on free-market principles.
Unlike previous administrations that used trade policy for domestic economic goals, Trump's approach is distinguished by his willingness to wield tariffs as a broad geopolitical weapon against allies and adversaries alike, from Canada to India.
The era of economic-led globalization is over. In the new world order, geopolitical interests are the primary driver of international relations. Economic instruments like tariffs and export restrictions are now used as levers to assert national interests, a fundamental shift from the US-centric view where the economy traditionally took the lead.
The current wave of global conflict and deglobalization is a direct consequence of a multi-decade populist trend. As younger generations demand fairer economic outcomes ('median outcomes'), governments are forced into protectionist policies, which inevitably create international friction and competition for resources.
The long-standing American political consensus favoring lower trade barriers has been replaced. Industrial policy, with active government shaping of key sectors via tariffs and investment, is now a durable, bipartisan strategy seen under both Trump and Biden administrations.
A line must be drawn between free markets and unchecked globalism. While globalism provides cheap goods, it devastates local workforces by outsourcing jobs. A sustainable capitalist system must operate within geographical constraints to ensure it creates a thriving middle class locally, avoiding the social unrest caused by globalization.