Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Instead of saying a CAD update took 10 hours, an engineer should explain how it reduced manufacturing defects or improved quality. Framing contributions in the "language of value" helps leadership and other departments understand the direct impact on business goals like revenue and cost savings.

Related Insights

The fundamental business purpose of engineering is not the act of writing code, but applying technical skills to achieve concrete financial outcomes. All engineering work ultimately serves one of these two goals: increasing revenue or reducing costs.

To capture an executive's attention, don't describe what you do; describe the outcome you're driving. In an anecdote, an analyst told the Adobe CEO she was 'doubling revenue for Acrobat,' not just 'working on the Acrobat team.' This impact-first framing instantly conveyed her value.

Not all design impact can be quantified with metrics. When data is unavailable, frame your value by highlighting contributions to competitive parity, internal team efficiency, or bug reduction. This holistic view of business health resonates with leadership beyond just product managers.

Bupa's Head of Product Teresa Wang requires her team to explain their work and its value to non-technical people within three minutes. This forces clarity, brevity, and a focus on the 'why' and 'so what' rather than the technical 'how,' ensuring stakeholders immediately grasp the concept and its importance.

To get product management buy-in for technical initiatives like refactoring or scaling, engineering leadership is responsible for translating the work into clear business or customer value. Instead of just stating the technical need, explain how it enables faster feature development or access to a larger customer base.

To prevent engineers from focusing internally on technical purity (e.g., unnecessary refactoring), leaders must consistently frame all work in terms of its value to the customer. Even tech debt should be justified by its external impact, such as improving security or enabling future features.

Technical executives often fail in interviews with PE firms because they can't articulate the business value of their work. Candidates must prepare to speak like they're in a board meeting, clearly connecting their initiatives to measurable outcomes like cost savings, revenue lift, or efficiency gains.

A key leadership skill is reading the room and translating deep technical discussions into concise answers that address a stakeholder's actual needs. Engineers often get lost in detail; leaders must guide the conversation back to the core question and its business implications.

To make your work visible to leadership, shift your communication from discussing activities to highlighting outcomes. Instead of listing tasks, explain the tangible business result your work generated and how it aligns with broader company goals. This frames your contribution strategically.

Engineering is a business function, not an isolated discipline. An engineer's value and job security are directly tied to their ability to contribute to business goals. Focusing solely on technical excellence without understanding its commercial impact is a significant career risk, especially during economic downturns.

Engineers Should Communicate Their Work's Business Value, Not Just the Hours It Took | RiffOn