Headline unemployment in India and Indonesia masks a deeper issue: underemployment. In India, 40% of the workforce is in the primary sector which produces less than 20% of GDP. In Indonesia, 60% of jobs are informal and pay below minimum wage, signaling a crisis of job quality, not just quantity.

The unemployment rate for college-educated young men has surged to 7%, matching that of their peers without a degree. This parity indicates that a traditional degree's value in securing entry-level employment is eroding for this demographic, challenged by AI automation and increased competition from experienced workers.

The difficulty in hiring young talent is not a temporary trend but a "new ice age." It is driven by a smaller Gen Z population compared to millennials. The problem will worsen: within a decade, more people over 65 will be leaving careers than 16-year-olds are starting them, creating a long-term demographic crisis for employers.

The official unemployment rate is misleadingly low because when disgruntled workers give up looking for a job, they exit the labor force and are no longer counted as 'unemployed.' This artificially improves the headline number while masking underlying economic weakness and anger among young job seekers.

The rise of a precarious gig workforce of over 200 million people directly contradicts the Communist Party's founding promise of a "dictatorship of the proletariat." This growing underclass, living with minimal security and rights, represents a societal shift towards a capitalist-style structure that the party was originally formed to overthrow, creating a deep ideological crisis.

A conversation with a job candidate from an economics master's program revealed significant anxiety among peers about the difficulty of securing employment. This ground-level anecdote suggests the labor market is tightening even for highly educated, skilled workers, a concerning sign for the broader economy.

China’s economic strategy prioritizes technology and manufacturing competitiveness, assuming this will create a virtuous cycle of profits, jobs, and consumption. The key risk is that automated, high-tech manufacturing may not generate enough jobs to significantly boost household income, causing consumer spending to lag behind industrial growth.

Robert Kaplan suggests the labor market's sluggishness might not be a simple cyclical slowdown. He points to a significant "matching problem" where open jobs don't align with the skills of job seekers. This structural issue limits the effectiveness of monetary policy as a solution.

Companies that over-hired in 2022 are now stuck with expensive employees who won't leave due to a weak job market. This creates a bottleneck, forcing companies to eventually lay off these 'seniors' to make room for new, cheaper 'freshmen' hires, signaling a turn in the labor market.