A rapid rebound in Venezuelan oil production is improbable, even with massive investment. The effort is constrained by fundamental infrastructure failures, like a deeply unreliable national power grid, which is essential for running upgraders and refineries. This makes a quick recovery lasting years, not months.
The prospect of reviving Venezuela's vast but dormant oil industry introduces significant potential for increased global supply. Morgan Stanley suggests this could suppress prices in the medium-term, a counter-intuitive outcome where resolving geopolitical tension leads to lower commodity prices rather than higher ones.
While the Trump administration promotes investment in a post-Maduro Venezuela, major oil companies like ExxonMobil are publicly skeptical. Their stance that the country is "uninvestable" due to the absence of rule of law shows that political guarantees are insufficient without fundamental institutional reforms.
While beneficial for U.S. refiners, a resurgence in Venezuelan production could harm U.S. shale producers. They would face not only lower overall oil prices but also a potential shift in marginal supply growth away from shale towards Venezuela over the next decade, diminishing their market position.
Before any significant capital flows into Venezuela's oil sector, the near future will be dedicated to political negotiation and establishing a stable legal framework. Major players like Exxon still consider the country "uninvestable," meaning the primary focus will be on creating the conditions for future investment, not the investment itself.
The oil market's lack of reaction to the events in Venezuela demonstrates a key principle: short-to-medium term prices are driven by current production and delivery capacity, not the theoretical size of underground reserves that may take years and billions to develop.
J.P. Morgan's research projects Venezuela could reach 1.4 million barrels per day in two years, but feedback from industry players suggests these numbers are "too low." This indicates that the U.S. administration and energy executives anticipate a much faster and larger production ramp-up than currently modeled.
A potential restart of Venezuelan oil is significant because it is a heavy, diesel-rich crude that has become scarce as U.S. shale dominates supply with light oil. U.S. Gulf Coast refiners, built decades ago, are specifically configured to process this heavy crude, creating a unique high-margin opportunity.
Despite holding the world's largest oil reserves (17%), Venezuela's contribution to global production is minimal (<1%). This critical gap between reserves and output explains why major geopolitical events in the country have little immediate impact on global oil supply or prices.
To spur investment in Venezuela's risky environment, the U.S. administration may need to employ a "carrot and stick" approach with oil majors. This could involve offering capital guarantees to de-risk investments (the carrot) or threatening to revoke leases on U.S. federal lands for non-compliance (the stick).
Market fears of Venezuelan oil flooding the market are misplaced. Experts estimate it will take at least three years and significant investment to bring just one million barrels per day of production back online. The immediate supply Venezuela can offer is minimal, making the news irrelevant to the 2026 price outlook.