We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
From her experience as a client, Rebecca Busk identifies two key agency failures. First, agencies intentionally overcomplicate simple concepts to sound like experts and sell unneeded services. Second, they provide intense attention during the sales and build process, only to become unresponsive immediately after the project goes live.
Agencies often pitch exciting, ambitious "North Star" campaigns that get one department excited. However, these ideas frequently fail because the client's internal teams (e.g., digital, PR, comms) are siloed and not aligned. The agency sells a vision that other departments ultimately block, leading to an inability to deliver.
Clients often say they want an agency to “push” them but then resist progressive recommendations. Vaynerchuk coaches his team not to “fold like cheap chairs” when challenged. The ideal client has a genuine appetite for change, not just one who pays lip service to it.
When a customer asks a simple question, providing an overly detailed answer is counterproductive. This "waterboarding by help" frustrates the buyer, who just wants their specific problem addressed. At best it wastes time; at worst, it actively convinces them not to purchase.
Ad agencies possess immense creative problem-solving talent but narrowly confine it to communication campaigns. They could deliver enormous value by redesigning a menu's choice architecture or fixing customer journey friction, but don't because clients lack the job titles and procurement processes to buy such "trivia."
It's common for a highly experienced agency leader to handle the sales process, only to pass the daily work to a junior-level employee after the contract is signed. To prevent this bait-and-switch, ask to meet the specific team members who will manage your account day-to-day before you commit.
An agency's failure is often a symptom of the client's failure to provide necessary tools, context, or access. Before replacing a partner, audit the conditions you've created for their success, such as providing a basic marketing calendar or strategic context.
Eric Samson founded his agency with a client-first, performance-based model, assuming its superiority would automatically attract customers. He learned the hard way that the "if you build it, they will come" mentality is a myth; even the best product requires a dedicated sales engine to find and win business.
A common agency failure is leading with their specialty (e.g., "we run Meta campaigns") rather than diagnosing the business's core needs. A strategy-first approach ties marketing directly to business objectives, ensuring the chosen tactics are appropriate and measurable, preventing wasted effort on channels that don't fit the goal.
The belief that more tools and features ('buttons') equate to sophistication is a fallacy. This complexity doesn't just create internal inefficiencies for marketers; it directly results in a fragmented and confusing experience for the end customer, undermining brand trust.
Forward-thinking agencies can lose business by pitching complex, integrated solutions when a client has a specific, immediate need and budget (e.g., traditional SEO). It's crucial to meet the client where they are and deliver value on their stated problem, rather than being "too proud or innovative" to do fundamental work.