In markets like Australia where tech M&A is less mature, a HoldCo's primary job during sourcing is often educational. They must patiently reset founder valuation expectations, moving them away from inflated media headlines and towards fundamentals like profitability and comps.

With hundreds of unicorns and only about 20 tech IPOs per year, the market has a 30-year backlog. Consolidations between mid-size unicorns, like the potential Fivetran and dbt deal, are a necessary strategy for VCs to create IPO-ready companies and generate much-needed liquidity from their portfolios.

A significant shift has occurred: private equity firms are no longer actively pursuing acquisitions of solid SaaS companies that fall short of IPO scale. This disappearance of a reliable exit path forces VCs and founders to find new strategies for liquidity and growth.

The most lucrative exit for a startup is often not an IPO, but an M&A deal within an oligopolistic industry. When 3-4 major players exist, they can be forced into an irrational bidding war driven by the fear of a competitor acquiring the asset, leading to outcomes that are even better than going public.

The focus on AI among institutional investors is so absolute that promising non-AI companies risk "dying of neglect" and being unable to secure follow-on funding. This creates a potential opportunity gap for angel investors to fund valuable businesses in overlooked sectors.

Aggregate venture capital investment figures are misleading. The market is becoming bimodal: a handful of elite AI companies absorb a disproportionate share of capital, while the vast majority of other startups, including 900+ unicorns, face a tougher fundraising and exit environment.

The dot-com era saw ~2,000 companies go public, but only a dozen survived meaningfully. The current AI wave will likely follow a similar pattern, with most companies failing or being acquired despite the hype. Founders should prepare for this reality by considering their exit strategy early.

For years, founders of profitable but slow-growing SaaS companies could rely on a private equity acquisition as a viable exit. That safety net is gone. PE firms are now just as wary of AI disruption and growth decay as VCs, leaving many 'pretty good' SaaS companies with no buyers.

Recent acquisitions of slow-growth public SaaS companies are not just value grabs but turnaround plays. Acquirers believe these companies' distribution can be revitalized by injecting AI-native products, creating a path back to high growth and higher multiples.