Venture capitalists often have portfolio companies that are profitable and growing but will never achieve the breakout public offering VCs need. These companies can become a distraction for the VC and can be acquired by PE investors who see them as attractive, stable assets.
Related Insights
Historically, private equity was pursued for its potential outperformance (alpha). Today, with shrinking public markets, its main value is providing diversification and access to a growing universe of private companies that are no longer available on public exchanges. This makes it a core portfolio completion tool.
Large companies rarely make cold acquisition offers. The typical path is a gradual process starting with a partnership or a small investment. This allows the acquirer to conduct due diligence from the inside, understand the startup's value, and build relationships before escalating to a full buyout.
The traditional IPO exit is being replaced by a perpetual secondary market for elite private companies. This new paradigm provides liquidity for investors and employees without the high costs and regulatory burdens of going public. This shift fundamentally alters the venture capital lifecycle, enabling longer private holding periods.
The narrative for attracting top executives is shifting. Many now see PE-backed companies as a "safe harbor." They offer a higher probability of a successful (though smaller) financial exit in a defined timeframe, which is increasingly appealing compared to the "shoot the moon" lottery ticket of a venture-backed company.
The mid-market offers the best risk-reward by targeting profitable, regional leaders. This segment is less competitive and process-driven, allowing for better valuations and sourcing compared to the overcrowded large-cap space or the hit-or-miss venture capital scene.
A significant shift has occurred: private equity firms are no longer actively pursuing acquisitions of solid SaaS companies that fall short of IPO scale. This disappearance of a reliable exit path forces VCs and founders to find new strategies for liquidity and growth.
Unlike venture-backed startups that chase lightning in a bottle (often ending in zero), private equity offers a different path. Operators can buy established, cash-flowing businesses and apply their growth skills in a less risky environment with shorter time horizons and a higher probability of a positive financial outcome.
As top startups delay IPOs indefinitely, institutional portfolios are seeing their venture allocations morph into significant, illiquid growth equity holdings. These "private forever" companies are great businesses but create a portfolio construction problem, tying up capital that would otherwise be recycled into new venture funds.
Over 80% of TA's investments are proprietary deals with founders who aren't actively selling. Their strategy focuses on convincing profitable, growing businesses to partner to accelerate growth, framing the decision as "partner with us" versus "do nothing." This requires a long-term, relationship-based sourcing model.
PE deals, especially without a large fund, cannot tolerate zeros. This necessitates a rigorous focus on risk reduction and what could go wrong. This is the opposite of angel investing, where the strategy is to accept many failures in a portfolio to capture the massive upside of the 1-in-10 winner.