Critical manufacturing expertise is not easily codified in manuals; it's tacit knowledge embedded in experienced teams. Offshoring production leads to an irreversible loss of this 'process capital,' hindering a nation's ability to innovate and scale complex industries, as demonstrated by the transfer of German rocket scientists after WWII.

Related Insights

Consultants and tech firms often define human roles by their most basic function (e.g., a doorman just opens doors). Automating this function saves costs but destroys the immense, unquantified value created through tacit human skills like security, guest recognition, and providing status.

Professionals often undervalue their knowledge. Framing it as a tangible asset that could be instantly lost through injury highlights its immense value and the urgency to leverage it beyond direct, time-for-money service work.

Leaders in large companies often lack visibility into the day-to-day workflows that drive results. They see inputs like salaries and outputs like KPIs, but the actual process of how work gets done—the institutional know-how—is a black box that walks out the door every day.

The belief that China's manufacturing advantage is cheap labor is dangerously outdated. Its true dominance lies in a 20-year head start on manufacturing autonomy, with production for complex products like the PlayStation 5 being 90% automated. The US outsourced innovation instead of automating domestically.

Manufacturing faces a crisis as veterans with 30+ years of experience retire, taking unwritten operational knowledge with them. Dirac's software addresses this by creating a system to document complex assembly processes, safeguarding against knowledge loss and enabling less experienced workers to perform high-skill tasks.

Investor Henry Ellenbogen favors two types of competitive advantages. First, hard-to-replicate physical assets like distribution networks, which are messy and time-consuming to build. Second, “soft” moats built on elite human systems for talent development, operational excellence (like the Danaher Business System), and sharp capital allocation. These are harder to see but just as powerful as physical scale.

The common practice of offshoring manufacturing, exemplified by Apple, creates a critical flaw by severing the feedback loop between designers and producers. This leads to suboptimal product design and simultaneously transfers advanced manufacturing skills and capabilities to other nations, like China.

AI tools like LLMs thrive on large, structured datasets. In manufacturing, critical information is often unstructured 'tribal knowledge' in workers' heads. Dirac’s strategy is to first build a software layer that captures and organizes this human expertise, creating the necessary context for AI to then analyze and add value.

The primary benefit of a robust domestic manufacturing base isn't just job creation. It's the innovation that arises when diverse industries physically coexist and their technologies cross-pollinate, leading to unexpected breakthroughs and real productivity gains.

Relying on a single "gifted" individual for a skill like copywriting creates a bottleneck. To scale that expertise, the expert must deconstruct their intuitive process into a concrete, teachable system for their team.

Industrial Process Is Tacit Knowledge That 'Lives in the Heads of People' | RiffOn