Many AI developers get distracted by the 'LLM hype,' constantly chasing the best-performing model. The real focus should be on solving a specific customer problem. The LLM is a component, not the product, and deterministic code or simpler tools are often better for certain tasks.

The "generative" label on AI is misleading. Its true power for daily knowledge work lies not in creating artifacts, but in its superhuman ability to read, comprehend, and synthesize vast amounts of information—a far more frequent and fundamental task than writing.

Simply offering the latest model is no longer a competitive advantage. True value is created in the system built around the model—the system prompts, tools, and overall scaffolding. This 'harness' is what optimizes a model's performance for specific tasks and delivers a superior user experience.

When AI pioneers like Geoffrey Hinton see agency in an LLM, they are misinterpreting the output. What they are actually witnessing is a compressed, probabilistic reflection of the immense creativity and knowledge from all the humans who created its training data. It's an echo, not a mind.

An LLM shouldn't do math internally any more than a human would. The most intelligent AI systems will be those that know when to call specialized, reliable tools—like a Python interpreter or a search API—instead of attempting to internalize every capability from first principles.

In its current form, AI primarily benefits experts by amplifying their existing knowledge. An expert can provide better prompts due to a richer vocabulary and more effectively verify the output due to deep domain context. It's a tool that makes knowledgeable people more productive, not a replacement for their expertise.

Just as standardized tests fail to capture a student's full potential, AI benchmarks often don't reflect real-world performance. The true value comes from the 'last mile' ingenuity of productization and workflow integration, not just raw model scores, which can be misleading.

AI validation tools should be viewed as friction-reducers that accelerate learning cycles. They generate options, prototypes, and market signals faster than humans can. The goal is not to replace human judgment or predict success, but to empower teams to make better-informed decisions earlier.

As models mature, their core differentiator will become their underlying personality and values, shaped by their creators' objective functions. One model might optimize for user productivity by being concise, while another optimizes for engagement by being verbose.