Different financing vehicles focus on different layers of data center risk. Securitization primarily underwrites the long-term value of the physical building and tenant lease. The risk of rapid GPU obsolescence is largely ignored by these structures and is instead borne by private credit and equity investors who finance the hardware itself.
Related Insights
The massive capital expenditure for AI infrastructure will not primarily come from traditional unsecured corporate credit. Instead, a specialized form of private credit known as asset-based finance (ABF) is expected to provide over $800 billion of the required $1.5 trillion in external funding.
Instead of bearing the full cost and risk of building new AI data centers, large cloud providers like Microsoft use CoreWeave for 'overflow' compute. This allows them to meet surges in customer demand without committing capital to assets that depreciate quickly and may become competitors' infrastructure in the long run.
Large tech companies are creating SPVs—separate legal entities—to build data centers. This strategy allows them to take on significant debt for AI infrastructure projects without that debt appearing on the parent company's balance sheet. This protects their pristine credit ratings, enabling them to borrow money more cheaply for other ventures.
A major segment of private credit isn't for LBOs, but large-scale financing for investment-grade companies against hard assets like data centers, pipelines, and aircraft. These customized, multi-billion dollar deals are often too complex or bespoke for public bond markets, creating a niche for direct lenders.
Evaluating data center investments is like analyzing net lease real estate. With a tenant like a MAG-7 company, the investment is primarily a bet on the counterparty's creditworthiness, not the long-term value or potential obsolescence of the physical data center itself.
Today's complex data center financing structures (ABS/CMBS) are not new inventions. They directly apply the same securitization technology and principles previously used for financing cell towers and residential solar projects, adapting them for data center leases and long-term cash flows.
Cash-rich tech companies avoid owning data center infrastructure not due to a lack of funds, but because their capital yields far higher returns in core technology. They strategically outsource the lower-margin, stable infrastructure assets to specialized investors, optimizing their return on invested capital.
Companies like Meta are partnering with firms like Blue Owl to create highly leveraged (e.g., 90% debt) special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to build AI data centers. This structure keeps billions in debt off the tech giant's balance sheet while financing an immature, high-demand asset, creating a complex and potentially fragile arrangement.
Accusations that hyperscalers "cook the books" by extending GPU depreciation misunderstand hardware lifecycles. Older chips remain at full utilization for less demanding tasks. High operational costs (power, cooling) provide a natural economic incentive to retire genuinely unprofitable hardware, invalidating claims of artificial earnings boosts.
Companies like CoreWeave collateralize massive loans with NVIDIA GPUs to fund their build-out. This creates a critical timeline problem: the industry must generate highly profitable AI workloads before the GPUs, which have a limited lifespan and depreciate quickly, wear out. The business model fails if valuable applications don't scale fast enough.