Cash-rich tech companies avoid owning data center infrastructure not due to a lack of funds, but because their capital yields far higher returns in core technology. They strategically outsource the lower-margin, stable infrastructure assets to specialized investors, optimizing their return on invested capital.
Related Insights
Unlike the previous era of highly profitable, self-funding tech giants, the AI boom requires enormous capital for infrastructure. This has forced tech companies to seek complex financing from Wall Street through debt and SPVs, re-integrating the two industries after years of operating independently. Tech now needs finance to sustain its next wave of growth.
Instead of bearing the full cost and risk of building new AI data centers, large cloud providers like Microsoft use CoreWeave for 'overflow' compute. This allows them to meet surges in customer demand without committing capital to assets that depreciate quickly and may become competitors' infrastructure in the long run.
Large tech companies are creating SPVs—separate legal entities—to build data centers. This strategy allows them to take on significant debt for AI infrastructure projects without that debt appearing on the parent company's balance sheet. This protects their pristine credit ratings, enabling them to borrow money more cheaply for other ventures.
Different financing vehicles focus on different layers of data center risk. Securitization primarily underwrites the long-term value of the physical building and tenant lease. The risk of rapid GPU obsolescence is largely ignored by these structures and is instead borne by private credit and equity investors who finance the hardware itself.
Corporations are increasingly shifting from asset-heavy to capital-light models, often through complex transactions like sale-leasebacks. This strategic trend creates bespoke financing needs that are better served by the flexible solutions of private credit providers than by rigid public markets.
Top tech CEOs are strategically using debt and inter-company investments to function like a cooperative financial ecosystem. They optimize their collective capital stack for mutual benefit, behaving more like hedge fund managers allocating capital than direct product competitors.
The true differentiator for top-tier companies isn't their ability to attract investors, but how efficiently they convert invested capital into high-margin, high-growth revenue. This 'capital efficiency' is the key metric Karmel Capital uses to identify elite performers among a universe of well-funded businesses.
The AI buildout is forcing mega-cap tech companies to abandon their high-margin, asset-light models for a CapEx-heavy approach. This transition is increasingly funded by debt, not cash flow, which fundamentally alters their risk profile and valuation logic, as seen in Meta's stock drop after raising CapEx guidance.
Today's complex data center financing structures (ABS/CMBS) are not new inventions. They directly apply the same securitization technology and principles previously used for financing cell towers and residential solar projects, adapting them for data center leases and long-term cash flows.
Companies like Meta are partnering with firms like Blue Owl to create highly leveraged (e.g., 90% debt) special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to build AI data centers. This structure keeps billions in debt off the tech giant's balance sheet while financing an immature, high-demand asset, creating a complex and potentially fragile arrangement.