AI coding tools can rapidly build the first 70% of an application, but the final 30%—the complex, unique features that define your vision—will consume the vast majority of your development time. This is a critical reality check for anyone starting with these tools.
Related Insights
Even though modern AI coding assistants can handle complex, single-shot requests, it's more reliable to build an application in stages. First, build the core functionality, then add secondary features, and finally add tertiary elements like download buttons. This iterative approach prevents the AI from getting confused.
Using AI to code doesn't mean sacrificing craftsmanship. It shifts the craftsman's role from writing every line to being a director with a strong vision. The key is measuring the AI's output against that vision and ensuring each piece fits the larger puzzle correctly, not just functionally.
While many new AI tools excel at generating prototypes, a significant gap remains to make them production-ready. The key business opportunity and competitive moat lie in closing this gap—turning a generated concept into a full-stack, on-brand, deployable application. This is the 'last mile' problem.
When using "vibe-coding" tools, feed changes one at a time, such as typography, then a header image, then a specific feature. A single, long list of desired changes can confuse the AI and lead to poor results. This step-by-step process of iteration and refinement yields a better final product.
Building an AI application is becoming trivial and fast ("under 10 minutes"). The true differentiator and the most difficult part is embedding deep domain knowledge into the prompts. The AI needs to be taught *what* to look for, which requires human expertise in that specific field.
Visual "vibe coding" platforms, intended to simplify development, can add unnecessary complexity and scope creep to simple projects. When this happens, it's cheap and effective to abandon the tool and start from scratch in a code editor like Cursor to maintain simplicity.
While "vibe coding" tools are excellent for sparking interest and building initial prototypes, transitioning a project into a maintainable product requires learning the underlying code. AI code editors like Cursor act as the next step, helping users bridge the gap from prompt-based generation to hands-on software engineering.
Traditionally, building software required deep knowledge of many complex layers and team handoffs. AI agents change this paradigm. A creator can now provide a vague idea and receive a 60-70% complete, working artifact, dramatically shortening the iteration cycle from months to minutes and bypassing initial complexities.
The focus on AI writing code is narrow, as coding represents only 10-20% of the total software development effort. The most significant productivity gains will come from AI automating other critical, time-consuming stages like testing, security, and deployment, fundamentally reshaping the entire lifecycle.
AI coding tools generate functional but often generic designs. The key to creating a beautiful, personalized application is for the human to act as a creative director. This involves rejecting default outputs, finding specific aesthetic inspirations, and guiding the AI to implement a curated human vision.