Even though modern AI coding assistants can handle complex, single-shot requests, it's more reliable to build an application in stages. First, build the core functionality, then add secondary features, and finally add tertiary elements like download buttons. This iterative approach prevents the AI from getting confused.
Related Insights
To get superior results from AI coding agents, treat them like human developers by providing a detailed plan. Creating a Product Requirements Document (PRD) upfront leads to a more focused and accurate MVP, saving significant time on debugging and revisions later on.
Human developers may prefer longer files, but AI coding assistants process code in smaller chunks. App developer Terry Lynn intentionally keeps his files small (under 400 lines) to reduce the AI's context window usage, prevent it from getting lost, and improve the speed and accuracy of its code generation.
When using "vibe-coding" tools, feed changes one at a time, such as typography, then a header image, then a specific feature. A single, long list of desired changes can confuse the AI and lead to poor results. This step-by-step process of iteration and refinement yields a better final product.
Instead of asking an AI to directly build something, the more effective approach is to instruct it on *how* to solve the problem: gather references, identify best-in-class libraries, and create a framework before implementation. This means working one level of abstraction higher than the code itself.
For large tasks like creating a business plan, act as a project conductor. First, prompt the AI for individual components like a table of contents or specific sections. Once all parts are generated, use a final prompt to synthesize them into a coherent whole.
To bridge the AI skill gap, avoid building a perfect, complex system. Instead, pick a single, core business workflow (e.g., pre-call guest research) and build a simple automation. Iterating on this small, practical application is the most effective way to learn, even if the initial output is underwhelming.
To get AI agents to perform complex tasks in existing code, a three-stage workflow is key. First, have the agent research and objectively document how the codebase works. Second, use that research to create a step-by-step implementation plan. Finally, execute the plan. This structured approach prevents the agent from wasting context on discovery during implementation.
For complex, one-time tasks like a code migration, don't just ask AI to write a script. Instead, have it build a disposable tool—a "jig" or "command center”—that visualizes the process and guides you through each step. This provides more control and understanding than a black-box script.
Non-technical creators using AI coding tools often fail due to unrealistic expectations of instant success. The key is a mindset shift: understanding that building quality software is an iterative process of prompting, testing, and debugging, not a one-shot command that works in five prompts.
When developing AI capabilities, focus on creating agents that each perform one task exceptionally well, like call analysis or objection identification. These specialized agents can then be connected in a platform like Microsoft's Copilot Studio to create powerful, automated workflows.
