We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Commodity supercycles are characterized by violent price spikes and crashes. This extreme volatility deters the long-term capital investment required to increase supply. Fear of another collapse prevents producers from expanding, thus ensuring the cycle of scarcity and price explosions continues.
Commodity capital expenditure booms historically occur during high-rate environments, not low ones. High rates signal an undersupply in the physical economy, indicating that capital must be deployed into 'asset-heavy' industries to meet demand, which in turn leads to a broad repricing of physical assets.
The oil industry's boom-bust cycle is self-perpetuating. Low prices cause companies to slash investment and lead to a talent drain as workers leave the volatile sector. This underinvestment, combined with natural production declines, inevitably leads to tighter markets and price spikes years later.
Unlike most commodities, a higher silver price doesn't trigger more production because 70-75% of it is mined incidentally with copper, lead, and zinc. Miners won't ramp up primary metal production just for the silver. This supply inelasticity creates extreme volatility when physical demand rises.
Normally, high prices signal producers to increase supply. However, cattle ranchers, having experienced a sudden price collapse in 2015 after a period of record highs, no longer trust that current high prices will be sustained. This boom-bust memory breaks the typical economic supply-response cycle.
Despite record-high commodity prices, mining and energy companies are hesitant to invest in new production. Shareholders, scarred by past value destruction from over-investment, are demanding capital discipline. This investor-led constraint stifles the natural market supply response.
Historical commodity supercycles are not smooth upward trends but are characterized by a series of distinct, sharp price spikes. This "bubbling cauldron" nature, driven by investor fear and subsequent underinvestment, can mislead participants into thinking the cycle is over prematurely.
For 20 years, pension funds and endowments shunned investment in mining and resources due to political and social pressures. Now, a confluence of geopolitical necessity and reshoring is creating a demand shock that institutional capital is unprepared for, forcing them to chase a supply-constrained sector and exacerbating the rally.
Despite a compelling fundamental story for commodities, significant capital has not entered the sector. Investors, scarred by past downturns and drawn to high returns in tech, are hesitant to fund new production. This capital starvation is the core reason the supply crunch will likely worsen.
For 50 years, commodity sectors moved in sync, driven by global demand. This broke in 2024. Now, supply-side dynamics are causing a divergence, with metals prices surging while energy prices fall, a trend expected to persist through 2027.
History shows a recurring 25-30 year cycle where capital starves 'old economy' sectors (energy, materials) for 'new economy' tech, leading to underinvestment. Eventually, physical shortages cause a violent rotation back into asset-heavy industries, a 'revenge of the old economy.'