A professional is defined as someone whose guiding standards come from their field (e.g., medicine, science), not their employer. This creates an ethical obligation to refuse directives from a supervisor if they conflict with one's professional responsibility, a crucial concept for experts in government.
Related Insights
Don't just accept tasks from your boss. The initial request often reflects habit, not strategy. Your primary role is to pause and question if the proposed task truly solves the underlying business problem. This critical step prevents wasted effort and aligns work with actual goals, even when it means challenging a superior's directive.
Accepting a government salary fundamentally changes an advisor's role into that of an employee, creating an obligation of loyalty that compromises intellectual honesty. To provide unvarnished, objective advice to leaders, an advisor must remain financially independent from the government.
The directive to 'stay in your lane' is often used to silence dissent. Counter this by expanding your definition of your lane beyond your industry expertise (e.g., marketing) to include your fundamental values (e.g., empowering women). This reframes speaking out as staying true to your authentic mission.
When leading a complex, member-driven institution like the IMF, the primary responsibility is not to impose one's personal beliefs. Instead, effective leadership involves understanding and serving the collective needs of the membership, even in a world with increasing complexity and divergent interests.
To accurately assess a leader's actions, especially an unconventional one, avoid asking 'What would it mean if I did that?' Instead, ask 'What does it mean that *they* are doing that?' This helps separate your personal behavioral standards from their actual intent and worldview.
When an employee seems defiant, it's rarely a deliberate act of insubordination. Instead, it's a signal that a request has caused an internal conflict or values mismatch. Leaders should treat this as a cue to investigate the root cause, not to punish the behavior.
The difference between a true partner and an employee is whether you seek their counsel on complex problems. If you consistently go to them for advice when you're unsure, they're a partner. If you only give them direction, they are not a "thought partner," which is a red flag for a C-level executive role.
Stated values are meaningless without enforcement. True operational standards are set by the lowest level of performance a leader is willing to accept. If you tolerate messy common areas or late reports, that becomes the actual standard, regardless of the rules.
When faced with an ethically questionable directive, refusing outright can be career-limiting. A more effective strategy is to research and propose an alternative product that solves the same underlying business problem in a more responsible way, thereby redirecting the conversation.
Instead of asking "Is this legal?", a better ethical filter is Charlie Munger's question: "Is this beneath me?" This personal standard prevents engaging in technically legal but unethical behaviors, like selling a financial product you wouldn't recommend to your own mother. It creates a higher bar for conduct.
