Instead of one large context file, create a library of small, specific files (e.g., for different products or writing styles). An index file then guides the LLM to load only the relevant documents for a given task, improving accuracy, reducing noise, and allowing for 'lazy' prompting.
Related Insights
Instead of relying on lossy vector-based RAG systems, a well-organized file system serves as a superior memory foundation for a personal AI. It provides a stable, navigable structure for context and history, which the AI can then summarize and index for efficient, reliable retrieval.
Structure AI context into three layers: a short global file for universal preferences, project-specific files for domain rules, and an indexed library of modular context files (e.g., business details) that the AI only loads when relevant, preventing context window bloat.
Don't try to create a comprehensive "memory" for your AI in one sitting. Instead, adopt a simple rule: whenever you find yourself explaining context to the AI, stop and immediately have it capture that information in a permanent context file. This makes personalization far more manageable.
The early focus on crafting the perfect prompt is obsolete. Sophisticated AI interaction is now about 'context engineering': architecting the entire environment by providing models with the right tools, data, and retrieval mechanisms to guide their reasoning process effectively.
Even models with million-token context windows suffer from "context rot" when overloaded with information. Performance degrades as the model struggles to find the signal in the noise. Effective context engineering requires precision, packing the window with only the exact data needed.
Long, continuous AI chat threads degrade output quality as the context window fills up, making it harder for the model to recall early details. To maintain high-quality results, treat each discrete feature or task as a new chat, ensuring the agent has a clean, focused context for each job.
Overloading LLMs with excessive context degrades performance, a phenomenon known as 'context rot'. Claude Skills address this by loading context only when relevant to a specific task. This laser-focused approach improves accuracy and avoids the performance degradation seen in broader project-level contexts.
AI-generated "work slop"—plausible but low-substance content—arises from a lack of specific context. The cure is not just user training but building systems that ingest and index a user's entire work graph, providing the necessary grounding to move from generic drafts to high-signal outputs.
Building a comprehensive context library can be daunting. A simple and effective hack is to end each work session by asking the AI, "What did you learn today that we should document?" The AI can then self-generate the necessary context files, iteratively building its own knowledge base.
Run separate instances of your AI assistant from different project directories. Each directory contains a configuration file providing specific context, rules, and style guides for that domain (e.g., writing vs. task management), creating specialized, expert assistants.