The lack of forced structure, in-person mentorship, and social guardrails provided by an office environment is particularly detrimental to young men who are still developing professional discipline and maturity.

Related Insights

The biggest downside of remote work isn't lost productivity, but the elimination of serendipity. It removes the chance encounters that lead to friendships, mentorship, and cross-pollination of ideas. For those needing to build a network, the convenience of working from home comes at the high cost of isolation and stunted growth.

Young employees' perceived lack of resilience isn't a generational flaw but a result of parenting that shielded them from hardship. The decline of teenagers working difficult, blue-collar summer jobs has created adults who are less prepared for the realities of the workplace.

High real estate costs prevent young men from accessing urban centers for opportunities and social connection. They substitute the rich, real-world interactions of city life with a cheaper, algorithm-driven digital existence on their smartphones, a dynamic from which tech companies profit.

High-profile abuse scandals have created a chilling effect, making men hesitant to mentor boys for fear of being viewed with suspicion. This understandable reticence creates a critical mentorship gap for boys, especially those without a father figure, who need positive male guidance.

Contrary to popular belief, Gensler's research and internal experience show that younger employees are the most eager to return to the office. They recognize that in-person work is critical for learning, mentorship, and building the "social capital" necessary for long-term career growth.

Merge committed to an in-person office, even during peak COVID, believing it was non-negotiable for speed and culture. The core reason: physical proximity makes team members care more about each other's success and holds them accountable in ways remote work can't easily replicate.

Gen Z employees often possess innate authority in modern domains like AI and social media, yet they may lack basic professional maturity and emotional skills, partly due to the pandemic's impact on their development. This paradox requires leaders to coach them on fundamentals while simultaneously leveraging their unique, future-focused insights. Leaders must listen more and coach more.

While remote work is efficient, it lacks opportunities for spontaneous chemistry-building. The speaker prioritizes in-person time for his remote team, noting that camaraderie is built not in meetings but during "the little moments in an Uber" or over lunch. These informal interactions are critical for effective remote collaboration.

Leaders complaining about Gen Z's lack of social skills are missing the point. This generation lost two critical years of in-person social development due to the pandemic. The responsibility falls on leaders to coach these skills, not punish employees for a gap the company didn't create.

A primary danger of AI is its ability to offer young men 'low friction' relationships with AI characters. This circumvents the messy, difficult, but necessary process of real-world interaction, stunting the development of social skills and resilience that are forged through the friction of human connection.