The AI era's high velocity of change, where market leaders can be displaced in 1-2 years, resembles the volatile dot-com bubble, not the last decade's predictable SaaS growth. This means founders must consider that even massive scale doesn't guarantee durability, making exit timing a critical strategic question.
Related Insights
Like the dot-com era, many overvalued AI startups will fail. However, this is distinct from the underlying technology. Artificial intelligence itself is a fundamental, irreversible shift that will permanently change the world, similar to how the internet and social media became globally dominant despite early market bubbles.
Unlike traditional SaaS where product-market fit meant a decade of stability, the rapid evolution of AI models makes today's PMF fleeting. Founders face the risk that their product could feel obsolete within a year, requiring constant innovation just to stay relevant in a rapidly changing market.
Similar to the dot-com era, the current AI investment cycle is expected to produce a high number of company failures alongside a few generational winners that create more value than ever before in venture capital history.
The "SaaS-pocalypse" isn't about AI replacing software overnight. Instead, AI's disruptive potential erases the decades-long growth certainty that justified high SaaS valuations. Investors are punishing this newfound unpredictability of future cash flows, regardless of current performance.
The historical advantage of being first to market has evaporated. It once took years for large companies to clone a successful startup, but AI development tools now enable clones to be built in weeks. This accelerates commoditization, meaning a company's competitive edge is now measured in months, not years, demanding a much faster pace of innovation.
The current AI boom isn't just another tech bubble; it's a "bubble with bigger variance." The potential for massive upswings is matched by the risk of equally significant downswings. Investors and founders must have an unusually high tolerance for risk and volatility to succeed.
Unlike the dot-com bubble driven by fleeting startups, the AI boom is a sustainable "megatrend." It's led by established giants like Microsoft and Google, developing on a compressed 5-7 year timeline (vs. 15 years for the internet), and operating at a scale 1000x larger, suggesting longevity over a sudden collapse.
In the SaaS era, a 2-year head start created a defensible product moat. In the AI era, new entrants can leverage the latest foundation models to instantly create a product on par with, or better than, an incumbent's, erasing any first-mover advantage.
The current AI investment climate feels as 'risk-free' as the 2021 bubble. Venture firms are likely using flawed loss-ratio models, underestimating how many AI 'unicorns' will fail to generate returns, just as they did with the B2B SaaS unicorns from the previous cycle.
The dot-com era saw ~2,000 companies go public, but only a dozen survived meaningfully. The current AI wave will likely follow a similar pattern, with most companies failing or being acquired despite the hype. Founders should prepare for this reality by considering their exit strategy early.
