We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
People feel safe and empowered when correcting others. To leverage this, make an educated but potentially incorrect statement. The other party's impulse to correct you will often lead them to reveal closely held or proprietary information they wouldn't share in response to a direct question.
To get past surface-level answers and understand someone's true motivations, ask them to go deeper than their initial statement. Then ask again, and a third time. This simple technique pushes past rehearsed responses, and the third answer is typically the one closest to the real truth.
Asking "what" or "how" questions can create cognitive load. Instead, use labels like "It seems like..." or "It sounds like..." to make an observation. This prompts the other person to elaborate and reveal information without feeling interrogated.
If you can't identify an executive's specific assistant, email a senior EA and deliberately guess the wrong names (e.g., "Is it Jane or Mike?"). This leverages reverse psychology, as people have a natural tendency to correct misinformation, often resulting in a helpful reply that identifies the right person.
When an executive says something you think is wrong, don't confront them. Instead, disarm them with a curious question like, "That's so interesting. What led you to believe that?" This shows respect, uncovers hidden context (like board pressure), and shifts the dynamic from a disagreement to co-creation.
Frame your problem hypothesis with phrases like "not sure if..." rather than making a direct assertion. This invites the executive to correct you if you're wrong. A correction is a reply, opening a dialogue and avoiding the defensiveness that direct claims can trigger.
When a prospect gives one-word answers, repeatedly and politely ask "Can you give me an example of that?" or "Can you be more specific?" This simple loop forces them to move from vague statements to the concrete details needed to build a case for your solution.
This conversational technique involves asking two open-ended questions based on the target's previous answers, then offering a confirmation that validates what they said. This loop makes the person feel heard and encourages them to share more, allowing you to control the conversation and extract information without it feeling like an interrogation.
People feel safer and less committed when saying "no." Instead of asking yes-oriented questions ("Do you agree?"), frame them to get a "no" ("Are you against this idea?"). This makes the other person feel in control, and their response often includes valuable, unguarded guidance and a list of their true objections.
When asking direct, potentially uncomfortable questions about performance or risk, start with a softening phrase. Saying "This might feel out of bounds..." or "I'm not sure how to ask this..." makes the prospect more comfortable opening up about sensitive executive-level problems.
When asking for sensitive data like sales numbers, prospects often inflate them. Prevent this by saying, "I know you're not like those companies that always exaggerate their sales numbers, but realistically, how many are you closing?" This uses identity framing to encourage honesty and get you the real data needed to build a gap.