Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Just as women use 'slut shaming' to collectively police the 'price' of sex and discourage undercutting, men use 'simp shaming' to police the price of commitment. Both are social enforcement mechanisms to maintain bargaining power in the sexual marketplace by shaming those who give away a valuable resource too cheaply.

Related Insights

A man's choice of partner is often a performance to gain social and sexual capital among other men. This is seen when men date only thin, conventionally attractive women publicly, despite porn data showing private attraction to larger women.

Beyond stated morals, a pro-life stance can be an unconscious mating strategy. By making abortion less accessible, it raises the consequences of casual sex, which disincentivizes promiscuity and helps secure investment from male partners in long-term relationships.

The speaker introduces "mate suppression" as a twisted biological impulse, particularly prevalent in toxic femininity, to harm the reproductive chances of perceived rivals. This drive manifests in behaviors that sabotage others' attractiveness or access to mates, explaining seemingly irrational social rules that secretly aim to handicap competitors.

Slut-shaming enforces a minimum "price" (commitment) for sex. Similarly, simp-shaming is an intrasexual male strategy to enforce a price for their most valuable assets: commitment and resources. A man giving these away without reciprocation devalues them for all men, so he is shamed by his peers.

The fundamental male desire to increase value in the sexual marketplace is a core driver for self-improvement, ambition, and societal contribution. Men who voluntarily opt out of this system remove a primary incentive for personal growth, leading to unpredictable social outcomes.

Both are price-enforcement mechanisms within a gender's dating market. 'Slut shaming' discourages women from lowering the 'price' of sex (i.e., requiring less commitment). 'Simp shaming' discourages men from lowering the 'price' of resources by giving them away without receiving sex or commitment.

Female intrasexual competition tactics evolve with age. Younger women are more likely to derogate a rival’s sexual morality (promiscuity), which is relevant to their mating market. Older women, whose social value shifts toward wisdom, are more likely to attack a younger rival's intelligence (calling her a 'bimbo').

By branding traditionally attractive masculine traits like dominance and aggression as 'toxic,' women can manipulate the mating market. This sabotages rivals' ability to select high-quality partners by steering them toward less desirable mates, thereby inhibiting their reproductive success.

The "having a boyfriend is cringe" trend, promoted by high-status women, may be an unconscious evolutionary strategy to suppress the reproductive success of other women, thus reducing competition for desirable partners.

Studies on ideal mate preferences show that both sexes find partners with zero sexual history (virgins) less desirable than those with a few (1-3) past partners. This suggests virginity, past a certain age, can signal social maladjustment or a lack of desirable qualities.